>> The trouble is that journalists have thrown quality together to mean lots of things. I
>> find the nonsense of "quality is poor as it lacks soft touch dashboard materials" particularly
>> galling. Hard plastics are aesthetics, not the level of "fitness for purpose" (quality).
Presumably this was in a cheap car, as wouldn't 'fitness for purpose' in an expensive car include good aesthetics? Ie. purpose becomes 'get me from A to B, and feel nice to be in as well'.
|