It was he who brought up his work of writing reports as somehow adding to his credibility. Since he brought the subject up, I see no reason why I should not critique it.
It was he who bought up the subject of personal insults as a bad thing, yet he who indulges in them all the time. Again, I see no reason why I should not critique his assertion.
Had he the wit to address the issues, then we could have focused upon them. But have you noticed how he, and especially Pat, never discuss the issues. Their approach is based upon making a baseless assertion and then whining abuse if their statement is refuted. Particularly if their assertion is shown to be naive and ignorant of the facts. Not ever do they come back with counterpoints or opposing evidence.
Considering how much time they spend commenting on the posting style of others, you would hope that they would have also paid attention to their own.
I often consider things I have written after the fact to make sure I understand how they fit into the chain of conversation. Would that they did the same.
Please note, no personal abuse here, no attacking of anybody, simply addressing the facts and issues.
|