>>All the news of sky would fall over upon Brexit, are based on some fudged calculation.
Do you accept that new regulatory bodies will have to be set up and others considerably strengthened?
Do you accept that many agreements will have to be renegotiated?
Do you accept that such negotiation will require new expertise, manpower and goodness knows how much consulting and legal support?
Do you accept that the new agreements will cause increased ongoing expense? (UKCAA for example).
Do you accept that many of these changes will cause considerable expense to the companies in that industry?
Do you believe that these changes will impact aviation, telecommunication, broadcasting, agriculture, finance, automotive, transport, and many more?
So where do you believe all that money will come from?
>>I am personally involved in writing some similar consultancy papers
That seems unlikely and quite difficult to believe. You have neither the fluency of language nor the quality of thinking to be able to write such a paper. You write illogical arguments which frequently show a fundamental lack of understanding and a lack of thought.
Your arguments, speculation and questions over Brexit, for example.
Perhaps you are much younger than I thought and quite junior, that would perhaps explain the type of thinking you exhibit. Perhaps you mean you have contributed to papers being written by others?
You would never be trusted by a consultancy firm to author such a paper for customers.
>>Consultancy firms produce papers based on who pays them - the true analysis what they do
>> in-house (on Brexit impact, they all are doing it) is very unlikely to be shared in public
>>domain.
Of course their analysis would never be shared in the public domain if it had value. That, fundamentally, is the basis of the business.
They do research, they analyse, they conclude, and then they share that work with those prepared to pay them for it. If one has paid for that analysis, or one is involved in such things, then the information is available.
Otherwise, not. And quite clearly you sit in the "otherwise" camp or you would be much more informed than you are.
[Smokie; that's as polite I can get. I could have written that whole scree in about 3 words, so look how hard I am trying.]
|
