I think other than "I know better than you" fighting, a forum should be used for exchanger of ideas.
While you may find it specific suggestion bonkers, it is not without merits entirely.
Some reports suggest that every person would be worse off. There is one below.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-money-income-wto-rules-oliver-wyman-a8457951.html
Reading it, I see no proof of calculation how the number was obtained - just some expert said so.
At least in my statement I have demonstrated a simple arithmatic how this can be achieved.
In our lifetime we are seeing a lots of Black Swan events.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory
In technology, economics, politics everywhwere we are like to experience things which once everyone thought impossible.
Finland did trial universal income.
Benefits are ways of distributing wealth.
Dividends are profit distribution among shareholders. A country can do the same (at least one off).
All the news of sky would fall over upon Brexit, are based on some fudged calculation. The every family £1000 worse can be counterattacked by every family 2 (or 3) * £615 better off type argument.
The govt prints money all the time. That does increase inflation. The £40 billion handout to EU is to buy deals which would make money flow to economy. The money distributed across UK citizens would achieve same effect (people will start buying things - hence pumping money to economy).
GDP going down is not always bad thing. If there is net negative migration and GDP does down, then Per Capita Income might even go up!
While you may laugh at some of my comments, large corporations and govt often say even more bonkers stuff but just because they are big people assume they are talking sense.
For once common people have challenged established thinking (i.e. anti-EU Brexit sentiment) and so called experts can't manage anything anymore.
|
