>>Sure, I get that, but the idea is that the weak/er immune response in people given just the one dose of the (as I say) a two-dose vaccine, could actually help the virus - facing its demise due to the lockdown plus the vaccine, to mutate.
Bucket science, exactly what antivaxxers love. PoS, as is expected from that world.
So, given that the flu vaccine is less effective than even one dose of a covid-19 vaccine, I presume that we should stop giving it, because we're making it stronger and more able to kill people?
Or is it that if only 50% of people have the virus then it will be more able to mutate? Surely the more people who have it then the more it will mutate? Look at Brazil.
Or is there some belief that if you intentionally leave weaker versions in place then they will prevent the stronger one appearing? Which is of course exactly the opposite of what happens. In any case, any idea how they do that bearing in mind that immunity levels from a vaccine are higher than from surviving a dose.
Or that the vaccine will fight harder once it realises there's nt much of it left?
|
