>> I'll admit to having only skip-read it, but doesn't Para 10 suggest that the judge
>> thought that was not the case?
Para 10 says:
Throughout the Indictment Period, it is accepted both that NatWest sought
to discharge its monitoring obligations under the Regulations and that it
failed to do so as regards the counts to which it has pleaded guilty
Not sure exactly what it says but not a clear statement that Fred Blogs of that team was charged and either convicted or acquitted.
There's also a statement later that when Nat West began investigation at request of law enforcement the Relationship Management Team were kept out of the loop.
|