It's a crowd-funded set up to satisfy Jolyon Maugham's self promoting ego. They don't hold Govt. to account, they bring spurious nuisance cases against the Govt.
This Govt. badly needs holding to account but Good Law Project is the last bunch of incompetent nutters I want doing it.
>They're not the first claimant to lose out because of failure to comply with time limits and they won't be the last.
Is that supposed to be an excuse or justification for their incompetence?
They actually lost out because they couldn't be a***d to either send it by courier or registered post and then didn't even check to make sure that it had arrived. They knew the latest date that it had to be submitted but still failed to comply. Speaks volumes of how serious they take their campaign doesn't it?
>Defendant states claimant's case contains factual inaccuracy and vice versa
>is in 'oodathortit' territory. If all the facts were agreed then the case might be settled...
I'm afraid that bit of legal jargon is new to me but as I said: "He's also going to have to explain in court his "factually inaccurate" claims."
Unless, of course, he backs down at the last minute.
|
