>> >>Even now, it would appear that PO management is of the view that a significant
>> number of the >>prosecutions were "safe", being additionally supported by non-Horizon evidence.
>>
>> Just shows how arrogant they are.
Probably a number of them were safe convictions. But once you go round deliberately withholding evidence, you have lost the moral authority to justify them. The irony is that if they had embraced the fact changes to journaling were made, kept a record of them, they could have been used to debunk a PM's defence that the system caused the shortfall.
Last edited by: Zero on Fri 23 Feb 24 at 12:13
|