I stand corrected, I can't say I looked into the legislation. It was more short hand for, suitable food purchased at point suitable close to the point of entry.
General point, not aimed at anyone.
Looking at that twitter post that the article came from, it's an interesting insight into people who hold strongly held beliefs on this issue. It's almost a total role reversal from the previous roughly 20 years. Issues like bendy bananas, food sold by the pound, colour of passports etc that were advanced by those who wanted to change the status quo highlighted them as everyday examples of a bigger issues and used as examples of what we've lost. . Of sorts they were a political insurgency. Their arguments were counted (by and large) by those who wish to remain as too small to worry about, overblown, irrelevant or factually incorrect.
Now those positions have been reversed, issues like this are advanced in the same way as those who wished to leave and their arguments are counted as too small to worry about, overblown, irrelevant or factually incorrect by those who are now arguing for the status quo.
Like I said interesting insight into those with strongly held views on this. I wonder if any of them are self aware to see it?
Last edited by: sooty123 on Tue 12 Jan 21 at 09:14
|
