>>I don't know what to make of 3)
I don't think there's anything to be made of it. It is pretty clear and unambiguous.
"1) is unfortunately not the terms on which the EU operates, so I don't see how that leads you to a 'remain' vote. Certainly if you want to make sure that [immigrants] "represent *at worst* financial and social neutrality to [the receiving country]" then you need to vote 'leave'.
Don't be silly. I want to remain but I want there to be different legislation on benefits and the like. Which I think should be Europe wide and the same for nationals or non-nationals. And that would be *exactly* the principle on which the EU operates.
You used the word "immigrant" Not I. I don't see why you would feel the need to differentiate between national lazy scroungers and non-national lazy scroungers. They both need their benefits cut to survival level, not enjoyment level.
|