>> >> Now OTOH if you introduce prejudice like that into the equation
>>
>> Interesting that you've gone straight to 'prejudice'.
I'll return to this point later when I've got time - presently taking a break form re-pointing a patio.
I see Nigel Evans wants his full legal costs for a QC etc met by the state. Now I actually think that's quite reasonable provided costs are examined for 'reasonableness'. An it used to be pretty much the case.
How did Nigel Evans vote on the clauses in the Legal Aid, Punishment and Sentencing of offenders bill (as it then was) which limit recovery to Legal Aid rates?
It maybe his honour is preserved by presumption that speaker and deputies abstain but the phrase 'hoist by own petard' comes to mind.
|