>> In this case, yes true. There was never any claim of potential doubt about who
>> the abuser was, there was no identity parade. It was a specific claim against a
>> specific person. The person was found not guilty of that claim, hence there was no
>> assault hence there no victim
>>
>> You body analogy does not hold water because there is proof of a body. Here
>> there is no proof.
The analogy was intended to be illustrative. NG does not mean nothing happened and that there is nobody entitled to be, and remain, aggrieved as to their treatment by X even after X is acquitted of a specific offence.
|
