>> >> >> No guilty verdict = NO victims...
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> Not true.
>>
>>
>> In this case, yes true. There was never any claim of potential doubt about who
>> the abuser was, there was no identity parade. It was a specific claim against a
>> specific person. The person was found not guilty of that claim, hence there was no
>> assault hence there no victim
>>
>> You body analogy does not hold water because there is proof of a body. Here
>> there is no proof.
>>
Thank you Zero for following my logic impeccably. :-)
|