Jobs come in all shades - standard WFH policies cannot be applied to all companies.
There are negatives to WFH - developing informal relationships, embedding new starters, being alive to wider corporate developments etc etc. 5 day a week WFH may be damaging for most businesses if extended indefinitely.
Equally many WFH benefitted from savings in time and money on commuting, and the ability to be far more flexible in integrating personal and work commitments. They are likely to want jobs that offer at least some WFH flexibility.
A lesson taught through covid and lockdown seems to be an increasing value attached to non-job related considerations - family, social, health etc. Some remain ambitious for financial and career progression - but for some this is no longer the over-riding priority.
Employers who want the best staff will have to accept they will need to find a compromise solution. Insisting on a 5 day office week will reduce the pool of potential recruits. With largely full employment (at present) job security is no longer a threat.
A hybid arrangement will depend on the nature of the job, but may typically involve 2-4 days a week WFH. Meetings and colleague interaction will be scheduled for days in.
This will not all happen as a "big bang". Large offices with dedicated personal desks will decline as leases come up for review and make cost savings possible. Not all staff will have home arrangements which make WFH easy, and need alternative solutions.
A dogmatic view of the outcomes is probably the biggest mistake - what happens will be determined by the economy, markets and events.
|
