Interesting but he doesn't address the fundamental question. Is there such a thing as absolute morality and where does it come form if you don't believe in a god.
He makes the statement:
"judgments that seem to me to be obviously true:
It is wrong to drive people from their homes or to kill them because you want their land.
• It is wrong to enslave people.
• It is wrong to torture prisoners of war.
• Anyone who witnesses genocide, or enslavement, or torture, is morally required
to try to stop it."
Well they might seem to be obviously true to him but there are plenty of people around today who would make an argument justifying any of them and historically plenty of people saw nothing wrong or immoral in enslaving others or torture.
I suggest our inbuilt "morality" is no more than enlightened long-term self interest. It is not good to live in society where you are free to kill and rob simply because others will do the same to you. There is no absolute morality. It is just a set of rules that we choose to live by for our own self interest and those rules change from year to year and century to century
Last edited by: CGNorwich on Mon 19 Dec 11 at 17:09
|