Took the Golf to VW main dealer for it's annual service and MOT yesterday. All routine, nothing special.
The only odd thing was that they have changed their policy regarding cleaning cars post-service to this being optional, and if I said no, they would plant a tree instead.
I saw a little placard that from memory said that they would be saving something like 250 litres of water per wash and this was being sold as an environmental step.
The cynic in me says that the car needed washing anyway, so whether it's my 250 litres (sounds a lot) or theirs, nothing's being saved, and actually the likely thing being saved is going to be the wages of the cleaning team that will inevitably reduce if demand drops.
Now if someone turns up with an already nearly clean car then fair enough, you just ask if they want it cleaned or not and you can cite environmental reasons, but this appeared to have a bit of a campaign behind it to push their green credentials and my 'cynic' alarm went off, and I left feeling guilty that I said I wanted it cleaned.
Don't get me wrong, both myself and the company I work for has had environmental considerations at the forefront since before it was fashionable (solar panels, rainwater harvesting, super-insulated buildings and warehouse, light tubes magnifying sunlight into the offices, LED lights triggered by movement sensors, and lots of other stuff, and we do make people aware of it, but it's more passive.
I am just not sure that I should feel guilty for not planting a tree and getting my car cleaned when I have just given them the best part of £400.
Is it just me?
|