My insurance renewal had some odd "clarifications" to a many clauses of the policy. Some were fairly cosmetic but they changed quite a lot to "if the house is unoccupied" and I couldn't see a definition of unoccupied.
I think they were referring to left empty for ages but as their agent couldn't really give me a decent answer other than waffle about what it might have meant when he last spoke to an underwriter ( - do they really ever let the call boys and girls out of their pens??). SoI thought I'd try here.
The follow up question to him was "if we've paid for the extended absence up to 60 days and we are away is the house unoccupied. And if so, if our daughter goes and stays for a night or two on day 20 are we wasting our money extending it from 40 to 60 days".
Anyway, we went with someone else, as that provider increased the premium by about 50% in the year for no good reason but found themselves able to take about 30% back off, still ending up more expensive that a policy with better cover plus some cashback.
Anyone have any idea about the question? CGN maybe?
|