It’s an interesting point, since I thought CCTV systems needed signs warning people they were in use. I guess a doorbell camera than can only see who’s at the door would be fine, but that the way these were angled (and many I suspect) meant that they captured a far wider area, including public property and indeed other people’s private property. There’s a domestic purposes exemption in the legislation I think, but it would (should?) be hard to argue that filming someone else property was covered by that.
Edited to add, beaten to it by Bromp’s far more comprehensive reply :)
Last edited by: PeterS on Wed 13 Oct 21 at 10:53
|