>.. from the same expert which hasn't been cherry picked or tabloid-ed.
The article you reference merely reinforces Zippy's argument. That the technology to detect and trace the communication of (any form of) data exists but what we do not have is any method of preventing the abuse of that technology.
Using "child abuse" as justification is simply cow dung, used along with "terrorism", to sell it to the unthinking.
Ask yourself who is likely to fall foul of Apple's little feature because it certainly won't be the child pornographers or terrorists who will simply switch to more secure communications or storage.
BTW. Why do you have a VPN client installed? Are you hiding something?
|
