>Of course not;
That was hardly constructive was it then?
>just that the view you express is totally at odds with what Tolley found.
No it isn't. That may be your personal interpretation but it certainly isn't mine. It states that he was abrasive but not abusive. He didn't shout or swear and didn't dwell on previous errors. He didn't target anyone in particular and the slate was wiped clean after any criticism. It boils down to some individuals who Tolley agrees may have felt intimidated by being criticised unconstructively in front of others.
>He also makes clear he's been light on detail about the allegations because of the risk of people being identified.
WTF has that to do with it? Are you trying to imply that Tolley did not take everything into account?
|