I've said much the same before....
Payments from tribunals are, or at least were, capped (at not a particularly high level), but I understood Rutnam was proceeding under "Whistleblowing" rules, which would have removed that cap.
£340K is, I suspect far more than he might have got for constructive dismissal or similar, I'm not sure about the whistleblowing approach (though getting a result under the latter always looked a bit tenuous to me).
|