>> To be fair, I had a good run with Warranty Direct on my Merc -
>> but I have a feeling they messed up somewhere as the price never changed over
>> 4yrs from when the car was 6 until it was 10, and I liked the
>> fact they cover wear and tear - they paid for suspension parts in the final
>> year that cost the same as the annual premium. I had no excess, no betterment
>> and full MB dealer rate cover.
If I read that right, you had repairs in year 4 to the value of the annual premium? What happened in years 1 to 3? No claims?
Do you think that was good value? Would you not have been better putting some money each week/month in a pot on the dresser?
This, to me, is very straightforward. The warranty company has to cover the cost of all its clients claims, plus employ office staff, assessors, directors, premises, profit and so on. The total cost to them must be far greater than the total cost of the basic claims.
They have a vested interest in quibbling and arguing with clients about the validity of their claims.
Buy a reliable car. Sorry, I know it's a statement of the blerking obvious.
Last edited by: Duncan on Wed 18 Sep 19 at 17:26
|