Modern motoring is, regretably, often confrontational. If you are trying to get out of a junction in the rush hour you are supposed to wait until someone lets you in. But after a few dozen drivers have ignored you then you have to be more assertive. You pick a weaker-willed looking person and edge out purposefully, hoping he will back down and let you out.
If he is more determined than he looks then he might let you out, but firmly close up the gap to prevent a whole stream of others following you through.
But supposing an autonomous car comes along. It's not going to deliberately risk a collision, as many real drivers do. It will surely back down. And once it has stopped and a stream of real drivers follow through, how will it end?
Another factor that has only just occured to me is that at present, we all acknowledge that other drivers are human. Even though we may be isolated in our boxes, we do interact with other drivers on a human level.
But an autonomous car with no driver, possible not even with anyone in it, is not a human. It is only a machine, it is not going to get out and punch us, it will not follow us and play silly games cutting in and braking hard. It is an impersonal machine, and surely people will feel no qualms about fooling it into stopping and giving way to us?
I sometimes feel generous to a fellow human, and wave someone on or smile and thank them, or get pleasure from being the one who reverses to the passing place. But I'm not going to have any feelings for a computer inside a metal box.
|