I am actually seriously considering buying this for a project/hobby car and to teach my children to drive in/service a car when they're a bit older.
www.classiccarsforsale.co.uk/detail/motors/classic-cars/fiat/regata/167373
Help.
|
£750 for that? Real value is closer to £40 scrap.
|
AK was a West Riding registration, Bradford IIRC, so it started out in an OK place.
|
Bromp... Bradford an ok place? It might have been when I was growing up there years ago, but I assume you haven't been for a while?
Neither have I, for a d**n good reason.
|
>> £750 for that? Real value is closer to £40 scrap.
>>
I think this is the clincher, really. If I could find an interesting old project car for under £100 I might go for it. £750 is never going to get Board Approval, is it?
|
WTF is that doing in a classic car add? It was a shed new, and its now a rotten shed.
|
Oh dear God ! You're not really going to inflict that on your children ( or yourself ) are you?
|
...I think he's already bought it, and used your tip about touching up the paintwork with a black felt-tip, to judge by the NSF wing......... ;-)
|
Mind you, scroll down that page a bit and there's a 124 Spyder...
I may have just bitten through my hand.
|
There's a nice-looking 900 T16S too. Not a Ruby but the next-best thing.
The Fiat is beyond awful.
And you've done the AC thing of posting a car in Non-Motoring. Do you have his excuse?
|
>> And you've done the AC thing of posting a car in Non-Motoring. Do you have
>> his excuse?
>>
No. Evidently my marbles are heading for the woodshed.
|
Runfer, I thought that 1990 Panda was more your thing. You keep going on about them.
That Spyder would be a huge disappointment after the Westfield.
|
>> That Spyder would be a huge disappointment...
Soooo pretty though. How did you know I'd had a Westfield? Have I mentioned it at some point?
|
I think you need a lie down, you'll soon feel better.
|
The number plate tells you all you need to know.
|
www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/
Check out the advisories....I wouldn't let a child of mine near this pile of crap.
|
Of course not, RP, it wouldn't be on the road until such time as it was fixed properly. That's the point of a hobby/project car. I have many years (6) until the eldest gets to 17.
It's a nostalgia thing with Regatas for me, I had one when I was a student and it was brilliant. Got me to Gibraltar and back, twice, from Nottingham. Slept in it often, never let me down, apart from a cambelt breaking (natch), but I got away with only one slightly bent valve, replaced the belt, and on it went.
There can't be many left, as there aren't many maniacs like me who think fondly of them.
|
It's a nostalgia thing with Regatas for me, I had one when I was a student and it was brilliant.
It presumably wasn't 31 years old, though - or 37, as this one will be if it survives till you have a young driver ready for it. I know there's an argument for learning in the simplest possible car, but this is already so far removed from the reality of modern driving as to be an irrelevance. I did some of my early driving in a 1985 car - but that was in 1988; I wouldn't want one now.
|
>> The number plate tells you all you need to know.
>>
I bought an Alfa 33 once, the last letters on the number plate were "DUD". Ha, thought I. What sort of idiot would be scared by such trivia?
I bought it and the cambelt broke two weeks later, on the way to a booked service appointment to have the cambelt changed. Car scrapped.
|
You are not beyond help but the car is...........
Why not buy it and keep us posted? That way your venerable Saab 9-5 thread will soon be exceeded ;-).
|
I saw an old D reg UNO today, bit scuffy around the edges but motoring along quite nicely. Maybe one of those would be a better bet? The UNO was a good characterful car in its day. I don't remember the Regata being particularly well written-up back in 1984.
|
Now an Uno would be worth getting. A totally underrated classic in the making (seriously!) I have half been looking out for one.
But as for the Regata? - well, whatever floats your boat!
|
Uno or old Panda. Both fun wee cars and oh so simple to work on. Achilles heel is the clutch cable though. The route it has to follow on RHD cars leads to it wearing.
Anything that age will have rust problems though.
|
>> Uno or old Panda.
I used to wonder if it would be possible to fit a Uno 1.3 in a Panda.
That would make a wolf in sheep's clothing.
|
....I had a Uno 1.3 (70) from new. In many ways a brilliant little car, but prone to rust from day 1.
In only a couple of years I was rubbing down and repainting the door seams (where they sat in water against the door seals), and if I hadn't noticed the state of the fuel tank support "bands", I swear it would shortly afterwards have deposited the whole caboodle on the road!
I don't think you'd get away with the indicator switches nowadays, though.
It was liked, however; In some ways better than the two Puntos (Mk1 and Mk2) we had later for SWMBO, both of which were really much better cars.
|
>> Uno or old Panda. Both fun wee cars and oh so simple to work on.
>> Achilles heel is the clutch cable though. The route it has to follow on RHD
>> cars leads to it wearing.
>>
>>>>
The Sceicento was of the same ilk. The shop had a Sport as a run around for about seven years and I had two clutch cables go while I was out in it, another went with someone else driving.
I did like it though, lovely little car to drive and you could chuck it round like a go kart.
|
There is something special about small Italian cars that makes them feel eager. Even those with the most basic of specifications seem to want to just go. Hang a large magnet off the back to catch the bits falling off and they are fine.
I'd have a modern Panda now as a runabout if I needed such a thing and to heck with those who think they are Noddy cars. They're great fun and quite practical too.
;-)
|
We had a mark 1 Punto 17 TD in 97 from new. It was a great little car. Pulled a 12ft caravan with no trouble and returned 45 mpg doing so. The Motobility people eventually wanted it back !
I remember setting off for Goswick Sands nr. Berwick with a full tank at the time of a tanker strike. I carried about 25 litres of DERV with us but we didn't need it in the end.
I would like to find a nice Renault 4 or 6 and put a Sierra engine and autobox out of a 5 in it for myself. No problem with the conversion, the Sierra engine is the same for all three later models but finding A) car B) an autobox might be a problem !
|
...I was always fairly dismissive of the Renault 4, until I had a hired one in Morocco in the late 70's, for a holiday climbing in the Atlas.
It also took us half-way to the Sahara over roads that were then virtually undriveable, and I have very fond memories.
(I say holiday, but it was more the nature of "experience", with a number of occurrences that ranged from the hilarious to the downright scary - I've never had a gun drawn on me by officialdom either before or since, but three times in Morocco!).
|
Did you know, ( here's one for the pub quiz ) that the front and back wheels are a different distance apart on either side of a Renault 4?
Can't remember which side has the longer wheelbase or why but they do.
|
..didn't know that this applied to the 4, but certainly does to later models (14/16?) due to the arrangement of the torsion bar suspension on the back axle.
|
I'm actually slightly worried that I knew that. I know it's OK to admit it here and everything, but it has just occurred to me that it might not be the best topic to cover at any kind of normal social gathering.
|
...my name is Humph, and I'm a caraholic...........?
|
I'm in denial.
But in fairness I didn't know it applied to other Renaults.
Last edited by: Runfer D'Hills on Wed 23 Mar 16 at 22:42
|
>> ..didn't know that this applied to the 4, but certainly does to later models (14/16?)
Yep, we had a 14. Dad had previously always gone for Escorts (no, the car), and he went back to them after this aberration :)
|
>>> certainly does to later models (14/16?
I remember that too... an uncle owned two 16s and the difference was quite noticeable if you compared the bodywork between the rear wheel and rear doors... about 2" I reckon.
As an aside the second of these was a bright red 16TX a couple of years old. Fully speccd way above a British car of the era, ride so smooth with thick comfy seats and very nippy.... if a bit roly on corners.
Last edited by: Fenlander on Thu 24 Mar 16 at 09:30
|
Did you know, ( here's one for the pub quiz ) that the front and back wheels are a different distance apart on either side of a Renault 4?
Can't remember which side has the longer wheelbase or why but they do.
Yup, but then I'm a mine of useless information. Right hand side is the longer one.
|