£2008 on tyres during 63 years of motoring? Having a laugh are they?
I spent close on 25% of that for the last set on the Soarer.
Under 6 grand to service 63 years of motoring. eff off.
|
>> £2008 on tyres during 63 years of motoring? Having a laugh are they?
Possible I get av 30k from my boots, at 60 quid fitted per corner.
63 years at 10k miles pa = 630k miles / 30k = 21 x 60 quid is £1260
>> I spent close on 25% of that for the last set on the Soarer.
Thats a far from average motor.
>> Under 6 grand to service 63 years of motoring. eff off.
At roughly a 100 quid per year, Only if you do it yourself that one I think.
|
>> >> £2008 on tyres during 63 years of motoring? Having a laugh are they?
>>
>> Possible I get av 30k from my boots, at 60 quid fitted per corner.
>>
>> 63 years at 10k miles pa = 630k miles / 30k = 21 x 60
>> quid is £1260
>>
Times four Shirley?
|
>> Times four Shirley?
>>
you are right of course o forgot that - but actually giving it some thought
I don't get 30k. I have put 6 tyres on the lancer in 120k, total 360 quid. 630k / 120k = just over 5, x 360 = £1890
still doable for mr aver age
Last edited by: VxFan on Mon 13 Apr 15 at 10:35
|
>>I have put 6 tyres on the lancer in 120k,
80,000 miles per set? Either your mileage is very high or the rubber must be long knackered by the time the tread is worn down.
Either way, I cannot imagine that mileage per set of tyres is either average or typical for most people.
|
>> >>I have put 6 tyres on the lancer in 120k,
>>
>> 80,000 miles per set? Either your mileage is very high or the rubber must be
>> long knackered by the time the tread is worn down.
>>
>> Either way, I cannot imagine that mileage per set of tyres is either average or
>> typical for most people.
They go on in twos, onto the front as new, wear down to 3mm and then go on the back.
The car has done 120k in 8 years. 100k of that in the last 5 years. So rubber age is not a factor, wear on the backs is about 1 mm per 20k miles, a new set on the back would easily do 100k, they get chucked before they wear out because the fronts are ready to go on the back before then
In my co car days I would get 25-30k from fronts and 60k from backs.
Last edited by: Zero on Mon 13 Apr 15 at 14:12
|
You don't half come out with a bunch of convoluted old rollux just so you can stick to your point.
|
Mark, you are a prick. sod off and bother someone who gives a crap.
|
and I don't think £100 plus per corner would be far from average what with all these big rimmed Beemers and audi's.
I only have 16" wheels on the Soarer.
|
>> and I don't think £100 plus per corner would be far from average what with
>> all these big rimmed Beemers and audi's.
Given that there are more small cars on the road with 15 inches and less.... Even my mid size jap estate has 15 inchers
|
Is your Mitsubishi a unicycle, Z? Or in other words, isn't there a factor of four missing from your calculation?
Ah, I see the others got there in the time it took me to press Post Message.
Last edited by: WillDeBeest on Mon 13 Apr 15 at 10:54
|
Plus the spare wheel.
Most tyres don't last 63 years, although I have had a few.
|
Much cheaper than wives though, cars. And you can get a new one more or less whenever and as often as you want if you choose to. Or just have several. All in all its not a bad deal.
|
Tell me about it. That's a screaming deal, even with Michelin Alpins at almost £250 a corner. Four wives or four decent cars? Let me think about it....
|
Four wives is ok if you can afford it: but all at once so they can fight over you...
|
Irritated of Norwich writes:
"£250 a corner"
What's with all this streetwise "a corner" affectation? Drives me mad. It's £250 each. One word instead of two.
|
>> What's with all this streetwise "a corner" affectation? Drives me mad. It's £250 each. One
>> word instead of two.
Oooaaarrr we knows you'm caaaarts only has two wheels boiy
|
"Next up" irritates me more. I actually want to hit people who say that. Well, that and "sat" when they mean "sitting". There's just no excuse. Most people have only one language to learn and have been doing so since infancy. What is so damned hard about describing the act of sitting? Eh, eh?
Anyway, back to cars I suppose.
;-)
|
You're / your
Their / they're / there
For these people should die.
Last edited by: No FM2R on Mon 13 Apr 15 at 17:30
|
People who ask me if I'm "alright" when they mean "hello", God that annoys me.
Back to cars then ?
|
MoneySupermarket offers this thought on the subject - tinyurl.com/kfpg7cf
|
At coming up for 1.5M miles of driving, I shudder to think how much I've spent of my money ( and indeed other people's) I've spent so far on fuel alone. At a wild and highly inaccurate guess it's definitely over £100,000 and might be approaching £150,000.
|
The one that really gets me is people using brought instead of bought.
Not sure why as I'm usually a believer in that if the meaning is conveyed then it doesn't hugely matter.
|
>> ask me if I'm "alright" when they mean "hello", God that annoys me.
Harrumph, er, Humph... it doesn't annoy me because I notice things like it all the time, but I would write 'all right', right?
Just saying, since there's so much verbal pernicketing higher up this thread. Just thought I'd join in.
:o}
|
Well, just sometimes these little things matter.
Guardian "Corrections and Clarifications" recently had this little gem:
An unwanted hyphen, introduced during the editing process, had us claiming in our print edition that the Villa Valmarana ai Nani in Vicenza, Italy, was “named for the 17-stone ‘nani’, or dwarfs, that surround the home†(Rail link would destroy historic architectural gem, 9 January, page 27). To clarify: there are 17 dwarf statues surrounding the villa, they are made of stone, and we’re not sure how much they weigh.
Last edited by: Crankcase on Mon 13 Apr 15 at 19:19
|
>
>> that the Villa Valmarana ai Nani in Vicenza, Italy, was “named for the 17-stone ‘nani’,
>> or dwarfs, that surround the home†(Rail link would destroy historic architectural gem, 9 January,
>> page 27). To clarify: there are 17 dwarf statues surrounding the villa, they are made
>> of stone, and we’re not sure how much they weigh.
Well we all knew it would have to be a very rotund dwarf indeed to weigh 17 stone.
|
1 stone, 17 stones.
To be clear.
;-)
|