F1 and general motorsport discussion - Vol 28 - VxFan
***** This thread is now closed, please CLICK HERE to go to Volume 29 *****
As the title suggests, a place to discuss Formula One, and all other types of motorsport (excluding MotoGP, which has a section of its own).
PLEASE NOTE:-
To try and maintain some kind of logical order of discussion, if you start a new subject then reply to this post and remember to change the default subject header.
>> Carlos Sainz Jr
>> www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/30253498
From this I read Max Verstappen will race for Toro Rosso. I'd missed that. So again the son of a racer getting into F1. Not knocking him but it must make it easier with all the connections.
In addition, a new rule to prevent drivers under the age of 18 from racing in F1 will be adopted in 2016.
Previously drivers had to complete a total of 300kms on track in an F1 car to qualify for a super licence. Now any driver will be required to hold a valid driving licence, be at least 18 years of age, and understand the sporting regulations and international sporting code.
They must also have two years' experience in minor formulas.
The announcement is response to the influx of young drivers into motorsport's top tier, highlighted by Toro Rosso's acquisition of Max Verstappen, who will be just 17 when he makes his debut for the team next season.
>> Suzie Wolf must be running out of time to get an F1 drive in a
>> race. She's 31 now.
>>
>> You'd have thought her husband could sort something out.
The only reason she has got anywhere near F1 is because of her husband. Take a look at her distinctly average at best driving record. She really isn't F1 standard, nor has she earned it.
>> The only reason she has got anywhere near F1 is because of her husband. Take
>> a look at her distinctly average at best driving record. She really isn't F1 standard,
>> nor has she earned it.
>>
+1
>> Suzie Wolf must be running out of time to get an F1 drive in a
>> race. She's 31 now.
>>
>> You'd have thought her husband could sort something out.
>> >> Jenson Button secures McLaren seat
>>
>> Right choice IMHO. I wonder if Honda had any influence in the decision, seeing as
>> they've got history with Button back in 2008?
>>
>> I wonder how long it'll be before Alonso throws his toys out the pram?
He wont., Jenson is second fiddle.
The only reason he has been chosen is that he has experience to develop and set up the brand new car and engine.
Suspect his popularity in Japan also figures. As for status and toys out of pram, notionally I'm sure Alonso is number one, but it should be clear after a couple races what the true situation is.
>> >>I wonder how long it'll be before Alonso throws his toys out the pram?
>>
>> Given the vast disparity in their wages, and thus assumptions about their relative position, sometime around never, I would think.
>> www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/30430564
"Alonso is believed to have signed a two-year contract with an option for a third year but will almost certainly be able to leave at the end of 2015 should the team's performance not live up to expectations."
Quite. Nascar is painfully boring although the cars go faster than F1 cars. One assumes the paying punters are hoping for spectacular shunts. But most of those are boring too.
Oh really ON. F1 is certainly competitive, just in a more complicated way than Nascar. There are even wheel-to-wheel episodes since some cars and drivers are a bit quicker than others and attempt to overtake.
Some people don't mind the relative complexity of F1 being accustomed to it from way back. Perhaps though it's a bit of an intellectual strain for others.
Personally I find Nascar as incomprehensible as it is boring. I get lost within ten laps. With F1 I can usually decipher what's going on.
Really all sport is boring and malign, and people pay far too much attention to it.
When was the last time you watched F1? Presumably when it was as you described. Without doubt some tracks are better than others for it, but the last season had some really good racing at times. (Aimed at ON...!!)
Last season you have to admit there was some good racing. Especially between the two Mercedes drivers. But other Mercedes engined cars as well. Ricciardo was good at time. The only disappointing driver (thankfully) was Vettel.
"McLaren chairman Ron Dennis and racing director Eric Boullier are holding a news conference, due to start imminently. ( 11:30 ? )
"...The pair will undoubtedly be asked about Fernando Alonso's condition. There are many unanswered questions surrounding Alonso's accident and his medical wellbeing.
"High among them is one arising from a report in Italy's Gazzetta Dello Sport this morning, which stated that Alonso was suffering in hospital from 'retrograde amnesia', which not only affected his recollection of the accident, but also 'other aspects of his life'.
"There is no confirmation whether this is true or not, but Dennis will inevitably be asked to confirm whether that is the case."
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/31895202
"Lewis Hamilton says he expects Ferrari to mount a challenge against his Mercedes team later this season."
Trying to talk up F1 ?
A suggestions that LH was cruising / just doing enough to keep the gap and not over stress his engine.
Vettel upset by Rosberg ?
A suggestion that Button had a de-tuned engine. If so a reasonable test run ?
I tend to agree with a suggestion elsewhere. Do not waste time watching a GP live but watch the highlights and do something more useful with the time you saved.
>> I tend to agree with a suggestion elsewhere. Do not waste time watching a GP
>> live but watch the highlights and do something more useful with the time you saved.
Given up watching F1, At least Mclaren managed to go race distance, they didn't even think they would do that.
Must say its getting bland with all the cars being small - Polos, Fiestas, I20 etc. Not that they are not quick.
Mexico has had a high attrition rate which keeps it interesting but what really impressed me was that a driver named Tanak put his Fiesta into a reservoir where they had to bail out and the car went down several metres. It was recovered by divers. The rules allow vehicles to be repaired overnight. They have a 3 hour window and then they can carry on the following day. The only component that cannot be changed is the engine.
With 9 mechanics, and any audience and from other service crews they managed to get the vehicle out within the 3 hours. Bet the seats were a bit damp though :(
Impressive! Unfortunately as they got out of service the engine did not seem to be running right they decided to call it a day to avoid any engine damage.
Surprised me, the speed they got out of the car. I understood it was nearly impossible to open the doors in water until the pressure equalised, let alone clamber round the roll cage. Have you ever climbed in and out of a car with a full cage?
Probably fled in terror at the prospect of joining the dead already in there! Reminds me of the Wannsee in Berlin. Not keen in the little dinghy we were messing about with, in case we fell in amongst the totenvolk....
>> >> it was nearly impossible to open the doors in water until the pressure equalised
>>
>> You don't necessarily need to open doors if windows are broken or missing.
or if the windows are broken or missing, the wait for equal pressure wont be that long either.
Sun 22 Mar 15 15:47
Goodwood Road & Racing live - Motors TV now - Focusless
Lots of classic cars racing at Goodwood in the sunshine on Motors TV, freeview 71 (HD boxes only). On until 1705.
Still Manor were only 3/5 seconds behind McLaren
McLaren were only 2/3 seconds from the front of the tables so there should be a better scrap down the back :-)
I'm going to watch the repeat at 4. So I'm going to avoid this thread until after that in case someone gives the result. Alas though, I expect a procession more or less.
Not sure how it happened, but I thought the replay started at 4, instead of ending at 4. So I had to watch an 8-minute highlights thing. Didn't mind all that much when it came to it, but damn damn damn all the same.
Haven't you watched F1 for a while, it was like 10 years ago, German and Italian national anthems and the winner in red.
Mercedes being overtaken on the track. . . . . .
Renault's suggestions on levelling the feel shown up - do they only wan to play when they are winning? Wolff saying he would like to be levelled with Ferrari . . . . . .
All three on the podium seem surprised at the result - even Vettel. Rosberg's fastest lap was 1.6 seconds faster than Vettel's so where did Mercedes get it wrong?
>> All three on the podium seem surprised at the result - even Vettel. Rosberg's fastest
>> lap was 1.6 seconds faster than Vettel's so where did Mercedes get it wrong?
>>
Mercedes failed to take the opportunity of a tyre change during the safety car period early in the race.
Last edited by: Old Navy on Mon 30 Mar 15 at 13:41
>> Did I miss anything? Did anybody actually pass anybody else?
There was quite a bit of overtaking midway through the race. And Vos Verstappen should be very proud of his son (Max). Not only did he finish the race in 7th on his 2nd outing in F1, he was also fighting Red Bull for position.
>> >> Did I miss anything? Did anybody actually pass anybody else?
>>
>> There was quite a bit of overtaking midway through the race. And Vos Verstappen should
>> be very proud of his son (Max). Not only did he finish the race in
>> 7th on his 2nd outing in F1, he was also fighting Red Bull for position.
Better than his dad then. There was a running joke in Holland about Jos having a bucket and spade in the car because he liked playing in the sand so much.
Was watching some of the chat after the race when Brundle made a comment about a conspiracy theory having seen Bernie talking to someone (Mercedes team) about 'turning the wick down' to keep it interesting. He then mentioned how quickly Hamilton could go when he needed/wanted to just before the pit stop. (I also got the feeling he got told to shut up)
Seems to me there could be more than a whiff of truth to this masquerading behind tyre management. Also gives rise to a bit of friction between the drivers which also adds a little spice to proceedings.
>> Was watching some of the chat after the race when Brundle made a comment about
>> a conspiracy theory having seen Bernie talking to someone (Mercedes team) about 'turning the wick
>> down' to keep it interesting. He then mentioned how quickly Hamilton could go when he
>> needed/wanted to just before the pit stop. (I also got the feeling he got told
>> to shut up)
>>
>> Seems to me there could be more than a whiff of truth to this masquerading
>> behind tyre management. Also gives rise to a bit of friction between the drivers which
>> also adds a little spice to proceedings.
>>
Maybe I should have said driving instead of racing. :-)
Anyone following it this year. Some interesting changes re weight penalties etc. Certainly the points were shared out in the first meeting. The RWD BMW's looked as quick as ever off the line!
A cracking drive by Shedden in race two, and overall a great start for Honda.
Andy Priaulx (returning) looks a very strong contender (and should be having won 3 world championships)
I'll be going to Knockhill again this year, but want to take the lad to another track also. Any recommendations for a good track and weekend away (probably camping, on site if possible) watching the BTCC?
Dunno where you live, I have done a fair few from the mad Gravett, Sytner, Harvey, Cleland days, and the best ones for viewing were Brands and Thruxton.
The "grid girl" thing is an embarrassment to the sport, but as they are there then they are presumably supposed to join in the "fun".
The opportunity is unlikely to arise, and I wouldn't be spraying people in the face myself; and somebody should perhaps have put him straight after the first time, but the Wail is being melodramatic and hypocritical as usual.
As for Ms Roz Hardie, if she objects to sexism she could ask why Formula 1 needs a troupe of nubile women, clearly selected for their sexual allure, on the grid in the first place.
A bit yobbish, but that's sporting heroes for you more often than not.
The girl won't mind much, and will doubtless be compensated. She will have been told more or less what to expect.
'Nubile girls for hire' have probably suffered worse in their time. Much worse perhaps. They need and have a steely quality, unless it's their first day.
You're making too much of it FMR, allowing the Daily Mail to wind you up just the way it wants to, in a pathetic passive way. Being led by the nose and harrumphing with kneejerk indignation.
As I said, sporting heroes are quite often yobbish. What do you expect? Read another paper, and don't mess with the internet if it upsets you. Ignore sports, they're terribly upsetting. Drink some warm milk and go to bed early.
OK he is a good driver under controlled conditions but he comes across as a typical person who is vertically challenged and has to prove something in the real world.
Last edited by: Old Navy on Tue 14 Apr 15 at 08:34