In another thread, there is a discussion about whether those who fail to insure are deserving of charity.
Today, I see a local man, who perhaps rather irrelevantly is suffering from cancer, has had his house burned down by arsonists. He has been left with nothing at all, apparently literally. To add to the woe, he has lost all his photos of his now dead son.
However, he wasn't insured.
So - is he deserving of charity, in the panels view?
Link to Cambridge News
tinyurl.com/lrs52af
|