I don't really understand AC. I may have had the wrong end of the stick but I can't see where the right one is ref: the come clean comment.
Nonetheless, I do agree that Oborne, and all the others, would either not do it or not have the opportunity to do it, if it wasn't revenue generating.
I laugh at the talk of press regulation when all that is necessary is for people not to buy anything they think unacceptable. Newspapers will maintain any stance they feel likely to protect their long term revenues, and will cease any behaviour likely to risk them.
|