Hardly worth replying to you Z since I sense that you are just stirring.
But, here goes
"So the best it has managed in the last 100 years is that it stunk of fish."
Well, perhaps you should research what London stank of before Mr Bazalgette came along and cleaned things up (a bit)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Bazalgette
Perhaps you should also research where most of the fish went yes, down south on overnight trains to feed the southern hunger for fish and chips. perhaps you should research the lives of these people who "stunk of fish to feed the country". I had 2 school friends who lost their fathers to storms while out on trawlers.
Perhaps you should research "air quality" or "air pollution" in present day London and Hull.
Would you accept my view that the only thing the North and South Downs have achieved in the last hundred years are to stink of sheep and horse poo? Would you accept that the main thing people noticed about London 100 years ago was the millions of tons of horse poo on the streets? Now that has been swapped for the incessant smell of diesel fumes.
"I suppose the decline of fish stocks is a government lie as well"
I didn't mention decline of fish stocks, nor government lies. Where did you conjure up government lies?
Mind you, I do remember a time when the East Coast ports , at certain times of the year were absolutely full of drifters during the herring season. Now you never see them. "Decline of fish stocks"??? No, due to changes in migration of the herring.
"decline of fish stocks" - cod and haddock undoubtedly due to over-fishing, but I didn't say it wasn't. I didn't mention fish stocks or government.
As for last comment "Still its nice to know all these recently recurring extreme weather events are not climate change. Thats a relief."
I presume that you are implying that I'm alone in my belief that that is the case. Although of course, nowhere have I said that climate change does not take place. It's just that it always has and I am not convinced that MAN is responsible or that man can do anything to affect climate change.
If so, that merely shows your ignorance.
Try researching what the latest statements from the IPCC AR5 ( you know, that organisation that is always putting out stories about the dangers of climate change) says in its latest report.
Want a few quotes/sources?
Try these
“confidence is LOW for global-scale observed trend in drought or dryness…”
“confidence remains LOW for long-term (centennial) changes in tropical cyclone** activity …”
“confidence in large scale trends in storminess or storminess proxies over the last century is LOW… “
“confidence is LOW for trends in small-scale severe weather events such as hail or thunderstorms.” (See AR5, Working Group 1, Executive Summary, Chapter 2, Observations: Atmosphere and Surface.
** Cyclones include both hurricanes and typhoons.)
"Supertyphoon Haiyan, locally known as Yolanda, made landfall last Friday on Guiuan, a coastal town on the central Philippine island of Samar around 410 miles south of Manila, it was described by some as the strongest storm to make landfall in the world this year, maybe ever.
So is it?
Data from the national weather bureau, the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration, or PAGASA, showed that Typhoon Haiyan’s intensity – measured by the wind strength at its center and the speed of gusts at landfall – Haiyan ranks at number 7 among the strongest storms ever to have hit the Philippines."
It was a category 4 hurricane/typhoon - didn't even get to Category 5
There have been about 35 Cat 5 Hurricanes in Atlantic since 1933 but none since 2007.
notrickszone.com/2013/11/21/data-show-cyclone-activity-following-temperature-difference-between-tropics-and-poles-dramatic-decrease-with-warming/
notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/are-uk-winters-becoming-more-extreme/
notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/
Come on Z, instead of glib, disparaging and unsubstantiated statements about things that were never said, how about some evidence for what you say? Just a simple starter
"So the best it (Hull) has managed in the last 100 years is that it stunk of fish."
Go on, prove it.
And, since you seems to believe that recently recurring extreme weather events ARE due to climate change how about a few bits of evidence for that? After all, you seem to be at odds with the IPCC.
Tell you what, here's another starter or two.
1. a. "Global temperatures have increased by 0.8 degrees from an average of 14 degrees since 1880 mainly due to man's influence." Please explain how the base figure of 14 degrees in 1880 was arrived at and how you distinguish man's influence from the causes of similar rises in temp in the past eg Roman Times and the Medieval Warm Period.
b. What caused "The Little Ice Age"?
2. Please provide some evidence for any increase for number of typhoons/hurricanes/cyclones in recent times. You don't even have to attribute any increase to "Climate Change".
3. Please name major N Atlantic Hurricanes since Katrina in 2005 to make landfall. (blimey, is it that long since a big Hurricane there?)
4. Why is it that NONE of the doom laden predictions of the last 20 years caused by climate change have materialised?
egs
1. Within a few years "children just aren't going to know what snow is." Snowfall will be "a very rare and exciting event." Dr. David Viner, senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, interviewed by the UK Independent, March 20, 2000.
2. "[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots…[By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers." Michael Oppenheimer, published in "Dead Heat," St. Martin's Press, 1990.
3. "Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000." Christian Science Monitor, June 8, 1972.
4. "Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010." Associated Press, May 15, 1989.
5. "By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half." Life magazine, January 1970.
6. "If present trends continue, the world will be ... eleven degrees colder by the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age." Kenneth E.F. Watt, in "Earth Day," 1970.
7. "By the year 2000 the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people ... If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000." Ehrlich, Speech at British Institute For Biology, September 1971.
8. "In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish." Ehrlich, speech during Earth Day, 1970.
Was he talking about Hull??
9. Oxford-based scientist Prof Norman Myers published papers in 1995 and another in 2005. claiming that 50 million people would become climate refugees by 2010, was shown in 2011 to have been wrong - leading the UN Environment Programme to drop a map illustrating the idea from its website.
Enough.
|