>> The court would no doubt have awarded her very large sum of money.
I was professionally involved in such a case. Compensation was well over a million thirty years ago.
>> Now consider a similar case where the allarm was detected but the woman suffered the
>> same brain damage. Nobody was negligent. She gets nothing.
>>
>> Same injuries very different outcome for the poor women in question
>>
>> Is that a fair and sensible system? would not a no fault compensation system be
>> more equitable?
Of course no fault compensation would produce a different outcome. There's zero political will.
|