>> Sunak's response was that Braverman had apologised and admitted her wrongdoing.
>>
>> He answered the question. You may not like the answer, of course, but he answered.
>> I can't see any evidence of bluster.
That was the nuts and bolts of his direct response to the question.
Starmer pressed him further:
Yesterday, the Prime Minister stood on the steps of Downing Street and promised “integrity, professionalism and accountability”, but then, with his first act, he appointed a Home Secretary who was sacked by his predecessor a week ago for deliberately pinging around sensitive Home Office documents from her personal account
The PM's response was to 'bang on' about 15,000 new police officers (no admission they replace those lost to austerity) and to the opposition 'backing the lunatic protesting fringe that is stopping working people going about their lives.'.
He did no better when offered a third bite at the cherry with a response in including a reference to My Corbyn.
hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-10-26/debates/DA634E71-6A00-4C9C-8D40-CCE730776B42/Engagements
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Wed 26 Oct 22 at 16:07
|