>> Different tale according to this:
>>
>> tinyurl.com/y3w2yprz
Just been debating this on another site with somebody I strongly suspect is our old sparring partner Iffy, though he now uses a different handle.
If the advertisers decide that a station pitched at anti Woke Gammons has an audience unlikely to be persuaded towards their flatpacks, 'cider' or skin cream then there's NO obligation to spend money with it. To suggest otherwise, ie that they should just pay up irrespective sounds like a levy. Or even a Licence Fee.
Why, in Daily Mail land are left wing groups always 'sinister'.
I also suspect the Mail would be on a different page if Tory MPs etc advocated advertisers boycotting Channel 4 News due to it's supposed pinko lefty lean.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Wed 16 Jun 21 at 15:29
|