>> OK, well I don't think I remembering it wrongly but it may well be that
>> it was raised on the group I'm in before it reached the press. Whatever, I'll
>> withdraw the comment and any inference as I'm not trying to be a disruptor.
It's likely that initial reports were regarded as outliers and the initial response from AZ was to say that it wasn't something that had cropped up in testing. A response along the lines of "we're looking into it" would be reasonable. It may be that process gave the appearance of reluctance to some but I don't think there was denial or anything grudging, just a normal scientific process.
|