>> The/A fan base is the fundamental building block to the financial success of football
Well, obviously. Without fans there is no demand. But "fans" does not equal "people who go to the matches". In fact, there is far, far more revenue available from people who do not, and far more revenue growth potential
>> fan reaction was the primary reason for the collapse of the ESL.
Very "power to the people". But the ESL has not collapsed so that might spoil the fairy tale a little.
>> Poo poo it if you wish (you will because that is your way and satisfies
>> your generaly football hostile proclivities) but you will be wrong because you dont
>> understand the fundamental building block.
"generally football hostile proclivities"? What are you on about? And what is it that I don't understand?
>>American soccer leagues have failed because they don't have a fan base.
Failed? By what metric(s) or standard(s)?
>> Football is not a spectacle for those who do not have a partisan interest. Teams
>> travel to new markets to play games to try and create that fan base.
Quite. Rather reinforcing my point about fans who visit the grounds and those who do not and their respective value to the clubs..
>> You are as wrong as a wrong person in the wrong place at the wrong
>> time about the wrong subject for the wrong reasons.
If only you were capable of explaining how I'm wrong beyond the tired old battle cries.
|
