>> We are used to people on benefits and very low incomes being told what to do by
>> government agencies and having little power to change the system.
>> The problem is that people like me are being treated the same way.
So you object to being treated the same way as someone on benefits or low income? You're income should bring you privilege?
>>My professional body requires me to fill in a 27 page online form each year for the purposes of regulatory review. I know, because of my involvement with the body, that our regulatory department is unable to see the information I submit.
There are many IT consultants that could help your organisation resolve it's failings. You could probably get Zero for a couple of doughnuts and a decent coffee. Not really anybody else's fault, is it?
>> Why not use discretion?
And what do we thing a lazy or disreputable accountant might do with that discretion? IOr should we make bad people agree to follow the rules and allow allow good ones discretion?
>> My bank want to know who runs my business. All they have to do is ask, but instead they require uploaded flow charts that require chartered accountants to prepare.
You need a chartered accountant to upload flow charts? I think you need to revisit that process.
>>And of course none of this stop Money Laundering or terrorism, because governments will not take on Facebook etc in terms of end-to-end encryption of messaging.
Facebook's encrypted messaging is use to execute money laundering?
>> Therefore, speak to a load of Chartered Surveyors who are the people that keep the
>> property market moving
Not the sellers & buyers? Perhaps an increased customer focus might smooth the paths?
Your entire post is at best naive.
|
