>>.... Secondly Rudd, when asked about targets, denied their existence. Shown that was wrong she then
>> tried to say they were only there because managers (by implication unofficially) set them for
>> purpose of performance management. Now it seems there were formal targets and she knew of
>> them.
>>
.....going back to the question raised in the thread title, this latter (being "economique avec la vérité") does, IMO, make her considerably more vulnerable.
The Government could better stomach her falling on her sword for this, than for the wider implications of the Windrush and immigration policy disaster, much of which maps directly back to the PM (when Home Secretary).
|