>> That statement just about weighs you up, comrade,
>> if I were Lud I wouldn't bother replying to such idiotic claptrap. :)
So, now I am a communist :)
Is it not possible to raise the fact that we do not need to spend 37.4 million quid to fund a bunch of people to lead an extravagant lifestyle, primarily for ceremonial purposes along with some procedural hangovers that could easily be cleared up, without being accused of being an anarchist and and communist?!
The flat in Brixton was perhaps flippant, but there is a fundamental truth there, if we have procedural holes that need to be filled by someone, that person can still be treated like anybody else.
If your logic is so flawed that you can't attack the argument, attack the person instead, eh?
tinyurl.com/6xykl
|
