>> The reality is that the judge will have responded by saying exactly the same thing
>> as last time. He will have redefined reasonable doubt (using the same words as the
>> previous time). And he will have told them that they have been presented with the
>> evidence and they should look at it.
From the DM link I posted earlier (a few posts down):
'In response, the judge reminded them the prosecutor had said that, if they concluded what the complainant said was accurate and truthful, then they should convict.'
Last edited by: Focusless on Fri 14 Feb 14 at 13:38
|