>> basically, what difference does it make. Each is equally heinous and not worthy of differentiation.
>>
The sentencing guidelines presumably do see a difference. If there is a sexual motivation for the murder then that would be a factor for a 'whole life' tarrif. Murder to secure the silence of a child victim/witness is heinous too but a notch less on the sentencing guidance.
A tariff of 38yrs means that he cannot even be considered for licence until 2051. In practice lifers, even model prisoners, usually need to apply more than once before licence so he'll be pushing 80 before there's even the chance of him smelling fresh air.
If he lives that long.
|
