>> So the extra ££s for a Mac over an "upmarket PC" HP/Acer/Lenovo etc is
>> not that big - however compared to entry level desktops @ say £300 the Mac
>> looks pricey!
When you consider TCO, a Mac is in a different stratosphere to a PC.
Firstly, the hardware costs against a PC of the same processor / drive / RAM / gfx spec are about twice as high, or were when I last checked.
Secondly, if you want to keep your warranty intact, you have to go to Apple for things like RAM and drive upgrades, or for spare parts, for which they charge you about five times the market rate. Even if you go to a reputable third party such as Crucial for RAM, for example, you will still pay £150 for 4GB of DDR2 SDRAM that would cost you less than a third of that if it were for a PC. Apple's prices for major components such as motherboards, graphics cards, and power supplies, which you HAVE to source from Apple, are truly eye-watering.
Don't forget too that the hardware upgrade path for Macs is severely limited. A PC can be made to support new interface technologies, new processors or new applications by simply purchasing and fitting the relevant hardware, which means you can, to a point of course, have your PC adapt and evolve to your changing requirements over time. Parts of my media centre PC in the lounge are getting on for 6 years old, some are 6 months old, and others are various stages in between. As I've needed the box to do something new, better, or different, I've just bought the bits and fitted them, for anything from a fiver to £200 (once) at a time. Much cheaper than binning the whole box every time and starting again.
Macs are simple and what you see really is what you get. Every piece of hardware inside it is a known quantity, has been properly QA'd, and you know the OS will support it 100% without the driver issues or obscure compatibility problems which sometimes crop up in Windows. But boy, do you pay for it!
Last edited by: DP on Tue 12 Oct 10 at 11:27
|