In my village we are on a hill and many houses have a direct line of sight due South and 6 out of 11 of them have got solar panels fitted. I have searched the internet and can't find a conclusive answer.
If the panels have been supplied free then the house owner gets the free leccie and the panel supplier/owner gets the money from the feed-in tariff, So, one wants to sell a house with stuff on the roof in which a 3rd party has a financial interest. Does that mean that they can block a sale altogether or is it that a buyer must agree to the handover of the tariff to the owner. It would seem to me to be a bit of a disincentive to buy a house with leased panels on it.
|
...or is it that a buyer must agree to the handover of the tariff to the owner...
That's my understanding, although others on here are more into property than me.
...It would seem to me to be a bit of a disincentive to buy a house with leased panels on it...
I agree, and would go further.
House buyers are generally conservative, so any panels - leased or not - will be off putting.
|
The prospect of paying £200k or more for a nice house with a crappy looking roof...
My suspicion is even if the panels belonged to the house the prospect of an extra 3 or 4 hundred quid a year feed-in tariff is not necessarily help the sale.
If the panels were not owned by the house then I'd imagine it is quite a disincentive.
Why not go the whole hog and rent your roof out for a mobile phone mast?
|
Dagnabbit! By talking about solar panels you've gone and got me solar panel adverts on the right hand side of my screen!
|
>> Dagnabbit! By talking about solar panels you've gone and got me solar panel adverts on
>> the right hand side of my screen!
Just look on the bright side.
|
The sun shines on the rightous
|
Or .. the sun shines on the right house.
|
Never buy at Brighthouse!
|