|
Serves the arrogant little scrote right. Trouble is, too many courts would convict the chap that threw him off for assault. Personally, I'd shake him by the hand and buy him a pint.
|
Second time I've heard the term "bawbag" in a week (and I know what it means !)
|
|
Glad that version came with subtitles. The version I saw earlier didn't.
|
Good man...more wanted.
I was on a train with a pal from work doing a ' rail rover ' of the North West. Long time ago now.
Facing us, on the other side of the aisle was a pretty young Chinese girl , student probly. Behind her sat a rough middle-aged man, drunk, who kept putting his head over the seat back and propositioning her loudly.
We could see she was getting uncomfortable and I was just on the verge of getting up and offering a seat swap when a chap, broad scouser about 70, 5'6" but built like the proverbial, dragged the drunk from his seat, pinned him by the entrance door and threw him off the train at the next stop. Runcorn East IIRC.
Lots of swearing from drunk but our scouser kept his cool and did the job without any help.
I think there are quite a lot of folk about who would rise to the occasion like that .
Ted
|
That was a severe breach of his human rights, Ted.
Nobody should be abandoned in Runcorn.
|
|
I use East Coast a lot. They have the usual male and female "Revenue Enforcement Operatives" but from time to time the job is carried out by tough looking men wearing one piece overalls and big leather belts with pepper spray, handcuffs and truncheons. Perhaps to deal with the "North of Newcastle" passengers?
|
This lot work in pairs, do not discuss fare dodging, (see transit officers powers) and tickets are sometimes checked on trains by armed police. That stroppy kids feet would not have touched the ground on his journey off the train.
www.transperth.wa.gov.au/TicketsandFares/Infringements.aspx
|
The stroppy kid, had of course, ridden that far without a ticket. So far as we could see, there was no penalty, other than being ejected from the train.
Some would say, that's a result - nearly home at no cost!
|
>> The stroppy kid, had of course, ridden that far without a ticket. So far as
>> we could see, there was no penalty, other than being ejected from the train.
>>
>> Some would say, that's a result - nearly home at no cost!
>>
Not so sure - here its quite difficult to exit the station without a ticket, and I would guess that could trigger a fine????
|
|
Good stuff, if it is enforced! Feet on the seats really annoys me! I think a $100 fine for carrying a felt tip marker pen is a bit harsh (last item on the list) but the rest looks firm but fair.
|
|
I like the fact that, having a cycle on board outside permitted hours carries the same maximum penalty as an illegal firearm.
|
>> Good stuff, if it is enforced!
>>
I assure you it is, I have seen it in action. You can forget pleading Human Rights if you break the rules.
My Scottish bus pass doesn't work either! :(
Last edited by: Old Navy on Mon 12 Dec 11 at 14:31
|
Every month staff magazine comes out and a few scroates have been prosecuted for fair evasion on Northern Rail usually for no more than £2.50 fair and a £500.00 fine nice. :-)
BTP British Transport Police come into stations and throw them off as do Network Rail security.
It's every day life i see it i love it.
|
I changed from the Altrincham tram to my home branch at Cornbrook last week.
There were a good dozen Metrolink inspectors on the platform, together with four uniformed police. I was asked for my pass/ticket as I got off the tram and was pleased to show him my ' twirly ' pass.
I think they catch a lot on the Metro.
Ted
|
>> Second time I've heard the term "bawbag" in a week (and I know what it
>> means !)
Can I presume it's what a Londoner would call a 'scrote'?
|
>> Can I presume it's what a Londoner would call a 'scrote'?
Heh heh... I wondered the same thing Wp. I think we may have it right.
|
|
Sorry if its the same. Feel feel to delete post mods.
|
|
Moved to the existing thread as it's a follow up to the original post.
|
Big man and yob on Scotrail identified.
The family of a suspected teenage “fare dodger” who was thrown off a train by a vigilante called yesterday for the man to be charged with assault.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2073660/
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/8953591/Train-vigilante-should-face-assault-charge.html
|
|
The father spoke on that dreadful Jeremy Vine's programme yesterday - right bleater, took exception too his son being called a "ned" (some form of Scots abuse) but made no apology for the searing of his son. "they all talk like that don't they" apparently some sort of student - probably some media studies course.
|
>> probably some media studies course.
Surveying, according to the DM story.
|
Complaint over man who threw 'fare-dodger' off train
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-16177725
Well that was pedictable and the excuses.
|
|
apparently the scrote is diabetic and had been drinking...i hope his doctor throws him through the door when he finds out aswell
|
BT Police charge "Big Man" and "fare dodger"
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-16288101
I feel a contribution to the Big Man's defence expenses are needed.
|
I'd say he was almost certainly guilty of assault. The fare dodger posed no physical threat to him and indeed no physical threat to anyone else. Hard to see what defence he could have for manhandling a stranger and throwing him from a train.
|
|
I assume they though that if he was on trial at crown court (or what ever the jock version is) the jury would never convict him in a month of sundays. I know a jury should have no reference to press, but its too late.
|
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scots_law#Criminal_courts
There ya go Zeddo.
Would be a Sheriff Court for assault usually - maximum sentence 12 mths or 5 yrs depending if just the Sheriff or Sheriff and Jury involved.
Anything likely to require a sentence greater is heard in High Court.
|
|
£10.00 towards his (The Big Man's) legal costs saved
|
>> Would be a Sheriff Court for assault usually - maximum sentence 12 mths or 5
>> yrs depending if just the Sheriff or Sheriff and Jury involved.
>>
>> Anything likely to require a sentence greater is heard in High Court.
>>
If it's like the English system...the defendant can choose if he/she wants a jury trial in the higher court...and as already stated he'd may well have been wise to do so..so the expense of it all and likely outcome may well have been a factor.
|
Not paying a fare isn't the right thing to do but the cost of travelling on a train in the UK?
Trowing this kid off the train don't know.The lads attitude should have been different to he conductor.Why didn't the conductor let the lad explain the cock-up?
|