Non-motoring > Common sense? Miscellaneous
Thread Author: Old Navy Replies: 6

 Common sense? - Old Navy
Could this be the first glimmer?

tinyurl.com/6kalgun

Sorry its the DM. :-)
 Common sense? - Bromptonaut
I agree that policy, whichever party is at the helm, is driven too much by alarmism and scaremongering. Whether that's true in climate change where there does seem a broad scientific consensus is a different question.

I don't think Andrew Turnbull's Cambridge degree is in a science subject.
Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Thu 9 Jun 11 at 11:20
 Common sense? - Old Navy
Do you need a science degree to know that the world is still coming out of the last ice age?
 Common sense? - Zero
>> Do you need a science degree to know that the world is still coming out
>> of the last ice age?

If we are, that makes his statement:


"Lord Turnbull also pointed out that ‘by and large humanity has prospered in the warmer periods’."

A little superfluous, as there hasn't been a "warmer" period

 Common sense? - Iffy
...I don't think Andrew Turnbull's Cambridge degree is in a science subject...

And if it were, I don't think it would make him any more qualified to comment.

Universities churn out too many clever idiots.

We are talking common sense here.

 Common sense? - Stuu
I thought by now people realised that whether or not climate change is real/true is wholly irrelevant so far as the policies surrounding it are concerned.
 Common sense? - John H
>> Could this be the first glimmer?
>>
>> tinyurl.com/6kalgun
>>
>> Sorry its the DM. :-)
>>

If you are implying that the climate change theory is wrong, then no, it is not the first glimmer. Nor is it right.

What is wrong is this, spending by Councils on huge salaries for "sustainability" officers in the name of climate change:
www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8557072/Councils-that-cant-afford-libraries-are-still-recruiting-highly-paid-sustainability-officers.html

Whilst action is needed, there needs to be a better cost/benefit analysis before the UK spends millions or billions on ineffective measures. The money should be spent where the most benefit can be gained - i.e. in the BRIC, CIVETS, and VISTA group of countries.

“BRIC” — comprised of Brazil, Russia, India, and China.

"CIVETS" - Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey, South Africa

"VISTA" - Vietnam, Indonesia, South Africa, Turkey and Argentina

Last edited by: John H on Thu 9 Jun 11 at 11:41
Latest Forum Posts