And I agree with that too.
Of course we don't know what, if any, conditions were communicated. But the rationale for these schemes seems obvious. If Fred, the breadwinner, were to die then what would his dependants do without his wages? Answer, he has 'free' insurance for death in service, no worries on that score.
Fred would have had a hard time taking out his own insurance when he's already suffering from something that's possibly going to kill him, wouldn't he?
I assume it is actually insured, and not a pension scheme benefit that rests on the scheme itself?
Last edited by: Manatee on Wed 26 Feb 25 at 17:06
|