Both Pru and Aviva still do pensions, drawdown and annuities but Prudential, now owned IIRC by M&G, might be 'de-risking'. I think they 'sold' the annuity book a few years ago which would have involved them giving the new provider a lump of money to take over the payments.
Pension liabilities where there is a defined benefit (yes I know it's a money purchase scheme) are calculated based on the amount of money that is required to be held now to cover the future payments.
There is any number of ways to calculate this but broadly and simplified, there are 3.
The 'technical provision' (TP) is a sort of best guess as the the amount, with a bit of prudence in it - but there is a material chance it won't be enough. It assumes the investment strategy chosen by the trustee which will generally have some risk in it.
The 'self-sufficiency' valuation - assumes a low risk strategy is nearer to the cost of using the fund to buy annuities for all the beneficiaries. So it's similar to the next version but without the insurer's profit.
The 'buy out' value. The amount of money an insurance company would charge to take the liabilities off the pension scheme.
Transfer values are generally around the technical provisions level. If a scheme wants to offload the risk, they know it will cost them a lot more (buy-out, rather than TP).
Before they do that, they might sensibly make a one-off offer of enhanced transfer values to the members who have not yet started taking their pensions, at a lower cost to them than paying the insurance company.
I suspect what is happening here is a version of that, and of course it's almost pointless me speculating, except to say that if it is genuine (and it doesn't sound like a fraudulent transfer scam but that needs to be checked) it is likely to be a one-off offer that could be to the pension holder's advantage if, for example, they intended to use draw down.
On the other hand, if there is a GAR (Pru for example did a lot of guaranteed annuities including on AVCs) then he/she needs to look at what it's worth to them were they to exercise it.
Another possibility is that there is some kind of terminal bonus that would be lost on transfer.
***I am not an expert and none of that is advice!***
Last edited by: Manatee on Wed 3 Apr 24 at 11:01
|