Non-motoring > P and O	Miscellaneous
Thread Author: CGNorwich	Replies: 130

New Thu 17 Mar 22 13:11   P and O - CGNorwich

Hope no one has a ferry booked. Looks like they are about to sack all their staff Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 13:19   P and O - Bromptonaut

And they have: www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/mar/17/po-ferries-halts-sailings-before-major-announcement Interesting to see how the levelling up agenda deals with that. If the ships are alongside for long then I guess supply chains will be beggared up as well. Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Thu 17 Mar 22 at 13:20 Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 13:37   P and O - Runfer D'Hills

Used to use P&O Dover-Calais quite a bit if the tunnel price was too steamy for a particular crossing. Fairly grotty ships though. Mainly use Stena for my Irish trips. Much nicer vessels. Last edited by: Runfer D'Hills on Thu 17 Mar 22 at 13:38 Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 13:53   P and O - BiggerBadderDave

Always reminds of Triangle. Wouldn't mind sharing a bunk with Kate O'mara (if she wasn't dead). Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 14:39   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Always reminds of Triangle. Wouldn't mind sharing a bunk with Kate O'mara (if she wasn't >> dead). Sadly, all of us here except Peter are old enough to 'get' that reference. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 15:54   P and O - Zero

>> Always reminds of Triangle. Wouldn't mind sharing a bunk with Kate O'mara (if she wasn't >> dead). I have seen her acting in that, its assumed she was. here you go www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqFHjpXkBbw&list=PLTLZ1lg0P-ESBqW7gNqRj6A7mE84kP1zX&ab_channel=Mark%27sMemories Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:56   P and O - Crankcase

>> >> I have seen her acting in that, its assumed she was. Funnily enough, saw her acting about three weeks ago in this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYGYLNWHtCM Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 17:31   P and O - tyrednemotional

>> Wouldn't mind sharing a bunk with Kate O'mara (if she wasn't dead). ...you getting fussy as you get older...? Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 14:55   P and O - smokie

I worked for P&O in Dover (on computers, not ships) for about 8 months after the Coal Board. The Herald of Free Enterprise went down while I was there. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 15:56   P and O - Zero

Lets see, you worked at the coal board - it was abolished. P&O? that one sunk. Wang? Well that went TU I see a trend here. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:34   P and O - smokie

Haha Z good point!! Place your bets on Barclays then, that's where I ended up :-) Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:00   P and O - Zero

Herald of free Enterprise, I know someone where I used to work who was on board that, and survived. He was then injured in the Clapham rail crash less than 10 years later. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:27   P and O - zippy

>> Herald of free Enterprise... Lots of locals were on that, using a newspapers go to France for £1 offer. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:09   P and O - zippy

>> I worked for P&O in Dover (on computers, not ships) for about 8 months after >> the Coal Board. The Herald of Free Enterprise went down while I was there. >> I had a mate that worked on computers there too. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:41   P and O - Kevin

>The Herald of Free Enterprise went down while I was there. Well, you learn something every day. I always thought it was because they'd left the bow doors open. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 21:21   P and O - Bobby

> The Herald of Free Enterprise went down while I was there. My boss at Norwich Union was the Captain’s brother. My boss was Peter Lewry. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 11:15   P and O - Robbie34

The Herald of Free Enterprise was owned by Townsend Thoresson and led to their demise. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 14:27   P and O - smokie

The European Ferries group (which actually I was employed by, but I worked at P&O main office in Dover) owned P&O, but I can't remember whether P&O or EF owned Townsend Thoreson. The TT brand was discontinued after Zeebrugge as it was considered tainted, with all those pics of the boat on its side with Townsend Thoreson uppermost. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 15:52   P and O - Zero

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60779001 Bussing in cheap replacement crew and security staff to force the old crew off I am no lefty leaning union loving commie by any means, but sorry thats right out of order. Not at all sure its legal either. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:11   P and O - zippy

>> www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60779001 >> >> Bussing in cheap replacement crew and security staff to force the old crew off >> >> I am no lefty leaning union loving commie by any means, but sorry thats right >> out of order. Not at all sure its legal either. >> It certainly sucks and they can't claim it's making the staff redundant if the jobs are still there. Sacked by video, as well, just one step off being sacked over the phone / by text. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:17   P and O - zippy

Missed the edit... The Daily Mail is reporting that security staff have been employed to clear the ships and have handcuffs to use. Is civilian use of handcuffs legal (against non consenting individuals)? Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:41   P and O - Lygonos

Maritime law innit. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 16:46   P and O - Zero

>> Maritime law innit. Not tied up to a British dockside it aint. Maritime law is enforced at sea by Officers on board, the RN and HM Coastguard. Ports have their own warranted police forces who enforce civil and criminal law Last edited by: Zero on Thu 17 Mar 22 at 16:50 Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:02   P and O - Fullchat

"Is civilian use of handcuffs legal (against non consenting individuals)?" As someone pointed out Maritime Law and Captains Orders apparently. Just checked that wth someone who was employed in that role on P&O North Sea Ferries. A lot of retired Bobbies had the job. The actual Seamen are UK. The staff are either Portuguese or Filipino depending on if the boat is Rotterdam or Hull based. We lost the Hull Zeebrugge ferry last year. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:53   P and O - sooty123

We lost the Hull Zeebrugge ferry last year. >> Seems rather careless Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 23:25   P and O - Zero

>> We lost the Hull Zeebrugge ferry last year. >> >> >> >> Seems rather careless Not lost exactly, the locations of the vessels are known, just not in Hull or Zeebrugge or anywhere on a path between the two Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 21:50   P and O - Duncan

>> The Daily Mail is reporting that security staff have been employed to clear the ships >> and have handcuffs to use. >> >> Is civilian use of handcuffs legal (against non consenting individuals)? >> Pendant Corner (been a bit quiet lately) Well the police use handcuffs against non consenting individuals and the police are civilians. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 17:20   P and O - PeterS

Agreed; it seems like a shocking approach. Dubai owned though; hardly the bastion of employment rights. Worse even than the BA ultimatum of imposing a new contract on its workforce a few years back. The use of force must be illegal? Though I read the the captain of the ferry in Hull as pulled up the gang plank, invoked naval law and is refusing the police entry. Says they have enough supplies to last indefinitely! Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:33   P and O - smokie

Did it have a large duty free shop? :-) Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 17 Mar 22 18:54   P and O - sooty123

I wonder how P&O trained them ? I'm not sure what type of courses they can do or have to do, there must be some sort of body overseeing that sort of thing. Anyone know? Reply to this message | Report message       1

New Thu 17 Mar 22 23:28   P and O - Zero

>> I wonder how P&O trained them ? I'm not sure what type of courses they >> can do or have to do, there must be some sort of body overseeing that >> sort of thing. Anyone know? Depends on where the ships are registered. In p&Os case - Cyprus. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 08:49   P and O - Duncan

I am dreadfully sorry, but I find it difficult to have total sympathy with the plight of the members of the RMT union. I can remember Bob crow. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Crow Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 09:09   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> I can remember Bob crow. >> >> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Crow With Jimmy Knapp and Sid Weighell beforehand. Crow died 8 years ago. Like the two above a good old fashioned union leader in an industry where mass membership meant they got things done for their members. Why the late Mr Crow means, as you seem to say, that P&O ferry staff had it coming is beyond me. I suspect though that the presence of strong unions with recognised collective bargaining agreements was why P&O went for the 'shock and awe' option. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 09:12   P and O - Zero

I quite liked Bob Crow. I think he based himself on Peter Sellars character Fred Kite, and refined the character in a deliberate manner for maximum affect for his members who loved him and to fool the employers who were scared of him. Very Very astute tho, very clever in his role, and very probably the most effective union leader ever. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 09:37   P and O - Duncan

www.rmt.org.uk/news/tube-strike-goes-ahead-next-week/ That link could have been posted any time over the twenty? thirty? years. It just happens to be about next week's strike. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 14:34   P and O - Duncan

Brompy said :- Crow died 8 years ago. Like the two above a good old fashioned union leader in an industry where mass membership meant they got things done for their members. Zed said:- I quite liked Bob Crow. I think he based himself on Peter Sellars character Fred Kite, Of course, I jus doan unnerstand. 'e was a luvly man. Loved kids, do'ed on 'is ole nan. straight as a die, 'e woss. That is of course if we ignore the misery that he and his union members heaped upon the British public over so many years. As ye sow, so shall ye reap. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 14:39   P and O - Zero

>> As ye sow, so shall ye reap. Yeah, If you were a boss he'd have eaten you for breakfast. And stuffed your pedant meter where the sun don't shine. (if there was room after the irony meter had found a home) Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 09:38   P and O - Bobby

Didn’t realise till last night that RMT were supporters of Brexit as it would free their workers from all the EU red tape…… Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 11:10   P and O - Falkirk Bairn

The Aberdeen to Shetlands Ferries are run by a Contractor Serco - some UK staff but the many are "cheap labour" from Asia - they do not need work permits for the UK because they live on the boat for many months and then go home for a holiday. A few years back the then contractor was accused of exploitation as they foreign staff were on much less than the UK minimum wage! UK minimum wage legislation was "not applicable" Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 14:35   P and O - Duncan

>> Didn’t realise till last night that RMT were supporters of Brexit as it would free >> their workers from all the EU red tape…… Now where did I put my irony meter? I could have sworn I had it a minute ago? Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 17:23   P and O - Duncan

>> Didn’t realise till last night that RMT were supporters of Brexit as it would free >> their workers from all the EU red tape…… pbs.twimg.com/media/FOEqEYAXsAUsCtw?format=jpg&name=900x900 Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 18:09   P and O - zippy

The new crews are being paid £2.60 an hour whilst at sea! www.tradewindsnews.com/cruise-and-ferry/p-o-crews-sacked-in-three-minute-call-as-replacements-paid-2-60-per-hour-/2-1-1187011 Last edited by: zippy on Fri 18 Mar 22 at 18:11 Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 18:12   P and O - smokie

Haha that didn't work out so well then did it... (Duncan's link...) Last edited by: smokie on Fri 18 Mar 22 at 18:13 Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 18:39   P and O - Terry

P&O actions seem unacceptable - an unpleasant surprise for those involved. Whether they have broken any laws is unclear. The letter from the CEO to affected staff refers to "800 Jersey contracted seafaring colleagues". Are they simply selecting Jersey staff because they are subject to different employment laws. Why are employees who apparently live in the mainland UK contracted with a Jersey company - tax benefits?? If P&O are reducing costs by 50% as reported, were existing staff paid unrealistic salaries. This does not make P&O actions any better - but did staff contribute to the problem by insisting on unaffordable pay levels. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 18 Mar 22 19:24   P and O - Robin O'Reliant

A friend's son is a captain on one of the boats, he got a call yesterday to tell him the news though he is off with Covid. He is expecting to be re-hired early next week on a new (reduced) contract. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sat 19 Mar 22 08:39   P and O - Zero

>> P&O actions seem unacceptable - an unpleasant surprise for those involved. >> >> Whether they have broken any laws is unclear. Seems they have, www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60800520 Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 23 Mar 22 13:34   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Seems they have, >> >> www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60800520 P&O say they were not subject to usual requirements as the ships were no registered in the UK. Change made when Chris Grayling was the Minister but which went under the radar at the time. www.lawgazette.co.uk/obiter/who-let-pando-off-the-legal-hook-one-name-springs-to-mind/5111959.article? Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 23 Mar 22 13:41   P and O - PeterS

Employment contracts almost always set out the law they’re governed by, and I’m sure I read somewhere that the P&O Ferries staff contracts explicitly said they were to be construed under U.K. law. Having said that, the compensation they’re offering is far in excess of what they’d be entitled to under most circumstances so what benefit that is to the now sacked staff I don’t know. Hopefully the company is fined £10s and £10s of millions as well!! Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 13:53   P and O - Zero

>> >> Seems they have, >> >> >> >> www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60800520 >> >> P&O say they were not subject to usual requirements as the ships were no registered >> in the UK. Now admit they did www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60862933 Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 14:00   P and O - CGNorwich

Interesting case. Would the workers have benefitted in the end if the company had obeyed the law, talked to the unions and ultimately gone into administration and the workers receiving statutory redundancy pay. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 14:06   P and O - Zero

>> Interesting case. Would the workers have benefitted in the end if the company had obeyed >> the law, talked to the unions and ultimately gone into administration and the workers receiving >> statutory redundancy pay. The original thinking was, I think, just to dump them illegally and get away with it*. Now they have been found out, they seem to have found large severance payments. Indicates to me they are not on the verge of immediate bankruptcy. *War in Ukraine, big news, good time to sneak this under the radar. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 14:14   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> The original thinking was, I think, just to dump them illegally and get away with >> it*. Now they have been found out, they seem to have found large severance payments. >> Indicates to me they are not on the verge of immediate bankruptcy. I suspect that's a good analysis and that they'd only pay the minimum. Subsequent media backlash and risk of adverse publicity when they're dragged through the Employment Tribunal and/or the courts has caused a reverse ferret. They were employed through Jersey*, which I suspect has a tax advantage to the company. Average salary (and I know averages can mean several different things) is being quoted as £37k. *Caledonian MacBrayne, with all their ferries registered in the UK, employ their seagoing crew via a Guernsey subsidiary. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 14:14   P and O - CGNorwich

They’ve probably cut the payroll by two thirds so the redundancy payments are affordable. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 15:41   P and O - Terry

P&O are part of a much larger group which could easily afford high redundancy payments. However their owner may be under no obligation to fund P&O (a separate corporate entity) losses - they could simply choose to let them go under. I also understand the offer to redundant staff is materially above what they may have received had statutory redundancy terms been applied or had P&O gone into receivership. Management may have simply decided they wanted to make the changes quickly and move on. The alternative would be protracted negotiations with a possible muddle as ships may have had a mix of staff on different contracts from different jurisdictions. This raises questions as to the basis of selection for redundancy and how they may be redeployed or offered alternatives. None of the above should be taken as support for P&O actions which I think unacceptable - merely trying to understand why management did as they did. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 15:59   P and O - Manatee

>> P&O are part of a much larger group which could easily afford high redundancy payments. >> >> However their owner may be under no obligation to fund P&O (a separate corporate entity) >> losses - they could simply choose to let them go under. Not literally, I hope. But it wouldn't be the first time a well financed owner has let a subsidiary go bust. >> I also understand the offer to redundant staff is materially above what they may have >> received had statutory redundancy terms been applied or had P&O gone into receivership. Is that before, or after the event and the outcry? I got the impression they had been shamed into it - could be wrong. >> None of the above should be taken as support for P&O actions which I think >> unacceptable - merely trying to understand why management did as they did. Incompetence. Or cynicism. Earlier I saw what I took to be the CEO on BBC News saying that they were obliged to have a period of consultation but "decided not to" (I might be paraphrasing). Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 16:31   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Incompetence. Or cynicism. Earlier I saw what I took to be the CEO on BBC >> News saying that they were obliged to have a period of consultation but "decided not >> to" (I might be paraphrasing). Somebody senior from P&O was in front of what I think was a Commons Select Committee today. Basically they chose to ignore the law as no Trade Union was going to allow its members to be screwed over in the way contemplated. Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 16:45   P and O - smokie

I can see why they would want to bypass the process. Consultation would be 28 or more days of flash strikes etc which wouldn't do the business much good. But unfortunately for them that's the way it works here, hope they get fined and appropriate (but not ridiculous) amount. (One of our local Tesco was fined £160,000 for 30 garlic baguettes, a Skyr yoghurt and two plain soya yoghurts which were out of date, which I thought disproportionate.) Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 17:57   P and O - Zero

>> (One of our local Tesco was fined £160,000 for 30 garlic baguettes, a Skyr yoghurt >> and two plain soya yoghurts which were out of date, which I thought disproportionate.) Have you tried out of date Skyr? Hangings too good for them Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 17:59   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Have you tried out of date Skyr? Hangings too good for them I had to Google the product. Is it even palatable in date? Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 18:43   P and O - CGNorwich

By coincidence have just eaten a strawberry flavoured one. Unlike yogurt it’s virtually fat free as it’s made from skimmed milk. Has a thicker denser consistency than yogurt and high in protein. I rather like it. Very on trend Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 19:07   P and O - Zero

>> By coincidence have just eaten a strawberry flavoured one. Unlike yogurt it’s virtually fat free >> as it’s made from skimmed milk. Has a thicker denser consistency than yogurt and high >> in protein. I rather like it. >> >> Very on trend When in date Reply to this message | Report message

New Thu 24 Mar 22 18:55   P and O - Manatee

hope they get fined and appropriate >> (but not ridiculous) amount. >> For me, a ridiculous amount would be proportionate when they have done it knowingly and deliberately. Regulators etc. take a very dim view of wilful non-compliance They were also supposed to notify the redundancy payments service before the start of the consultation period (ordinarily 45 days for 100+ redundancies). The penalty for not notifying the RPS is an unlimited fine. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 10:23   P and O - zippy

A director (MD or CEO) from the firm was being interviewed by a select committee yesterday. He said that he would break the law again if he had to. Surely that’s grounds for being barred as a director? Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 10:40   P and O - Terry

Unquestionably misconduct. But I believe there is a process to go through before this can happen - probably involving lawyers and courts etc. If he puts up a defence, rather than meekly accepting the result, if could take months. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 10:50   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> He said that he would break the law again if he had to. >> >> Surely that’s grounds for being barred as a director? Possibly. Legal analysis on the radio this morning is that there are two legal breaches. The failure to follow the proper notice/consultation process would be remedied by the employee taking proceedings in the Employment Tribunal. There's no criminal offence for which they could be convicted/fined involved in that. The potential offence is failure to notify various arms of government, including the Insolvency Service, where redundancies on this scale are contemplated. The commentator however thought that conviction for the offence was not a nailed on certainty; P&O might have wriggle room. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 12:54   P and O - Falkirk Bairn

P&O Cruises, owned by Carnival in Miami, are bring out adverts to say that they are a completely different company from P&O Ferries. Similar names - at one time they were owned by the same company but that was over 20 years ago. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 13:11   P and O - Rudedog

I heard the piece on the R4 Business news this morning and thought the issue is that they can't be prosecuted as they might have breeched a 'guideline' but there is no actual law to say they 'have' to consult and that this was something the Govt were going to look at and tighten up on. Maybe that was why he was so blazon about saying it... Doesn't the parent company have big stakes in many of the UK Free Ports? Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 15:49   P and O - Terry

This is one for the lawyers: - the ferries are registered overseas - the staff were on contract to a Jersey company (not part of the UK!) - P&O Ferries Holdings seems registered in the UK, but the corporate structure is complex. The 1996 Employment Rights Act defines “employer”, in relation to an employee or a worker, means the person by whom the employee or worker is (or, where the employment has ceased, was) employed. Whether P&O Ferries are actually responsible under the act is unclear. More likely their response will be governed by damage to the brand. Knee jerk legislative changes (however desirable) may cause more problems than solutions. Making it onerous for shipping, aviation or freight companies to employ UK nationals may simply reduce opportunities, and encourage recruitment where employment rights are less enthusiastically enforced. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 17:40   P and O - smokie

"Boris Johnson supported Transport Secretary Grant Shapps in urging Peter Hebblethwaite to step down after his "brazen" law breaking, No 10 said." www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60872294 Oh really? Methinks he should lead by example. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 19:06   P and O - CGNorwich

I agree it was wrong and most likely illegal but 1 A company that would have gone bust survives 2 A proportion of the crew were happy to take the large payoff 3 as many people are working for the company as before albeit on lower wages. No doubt the new employees were happy to get the job 4 The public and industry still have a ferry company to provide competition 5 The government continues to receive tax from the company. On the debit side some of the crew will need to find new jobs albeit in a buoyant employment market. Reply to this message | Report message

New Fri 25 Mar 22 19:23   P and O - zippy

>> >> 1 A company that would have gone bust survives >> I worked, in a banking aspect, on the failure of one of the few UK recycled paper plants. It was an amazing place, visiting reminded me of the interior scenes from The Forbidden Planet, but costs were an issue and there was over-capacity in the market, especially in light of reducing newspaper circulation. The owners even sold the place with a multimillion pound dowry and an American company purchased it for £1. Shut it down and sold the land for a lot of money for re-development. Basically, the situation appears to be the same re the Channel Ferries, there is over-capacity and the only way for all to survive is for one or more operators to close, sadly. I don't know if this is a short term over-capacity and P&O are waiting for trade to pick up, whatever, they have gone about this in totally the wrong way. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 11:04   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Basically, the situation appears to be the same re the Channel Ferries, there is over-capacity >> and the only way for all to survive is for one or more operators to >> close, sadly. I think there's always been over capacity, certainly so as soon as a third operator gets involved. When I first crossed Dover/Folkestone to Calais/Boulogne as the short sea crossings were then aged 13 in 1973 Sealink and Townsend Thoresen had a duopoly. Later in the seventies Normandy Ferries, possibly already a P&O subsidiary joined in and then dropped out again when the going got tough in the early eighties recession. P&O bought out Townsend Thoresen in the late eighties and Sealink became Stena Line eventually merging with P&O. Sea France and later Norfolk Line appeared on the scene. Sea France, government support notwithstanding, was squeezed out. It begat My Ferry Link which again failed and was taken over by Norfolk Line's successor DFDS. For a while we had a DFDS/P&O duopoly. In the last couple of years Irish Ferries, who reportedly already crew their ships in the agency/foreign model now adopted by P&O, have moved in. I'd imagine DFDS, with vessels registered mostly in France and presumably EU level staffing costs, will now come under pressure. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 11:21   P and O - Terry

Channel tunnel opened in 1994 and rapidly built up business - since 1998 passenger volumes have remained fairly constant. This would have caused the existing ferry companies massive problems - all fighting for for a share of a smaller market. So mergers, takeovers, closures would have been par for the course for several years afterwards. Then Covid and all volumes massively down with large losses, ships laid up, staff furloughed where possible. No surprise P&O were close to going to the wall. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 11:47   P and O - Zero

With the channel tunnel in situ, ferries across the short stretches to Europe are strategic rather than economic. That means they need to be there in case of a channel tunnel failure or the country will grind to a halt /starve. Being strategic, there is some credence for having gov support. Plus you cant get an armoured brigade with challenger 2's, warriors, trojans on a le shuttle. And that though has very much been on the table recently. Marchwood sea mounting centre wouldn't cope. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 12:22   P and O - Crankcase

As a child we used the ferries. When I got married and went to France a few times in the nineties with Mrs C's folks, they were NOT happy about crossing the channel on a boat - so we used the hovercraft. Although bouncy, I think it took about 30 minutes, something like that? They could live with that, whilst Mrs C and I actively enjoyed it. Went on the Princess Anne hovercraft I think. Then they binned it, alas. We did use one to cross to the Isle of Wight a couple of years ago - brilliant form of transport in my book. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 14:11   P and O - sherlock47

Not sure that in the options recounted so far anyone has mentioned the Dover Calais service that used a hydrofoil. I remember a trip where the weather was rough - only marginally suitable?, and the banging and shaking of the whole structure was (at best), worrying. Taliking to a fellow passenger who was a regular user, he told me that he had never experienced anything that bad. The only conclusion was that the 'Captain' lived in Dover and did not want to get stranded in France! I recall describing it as an accident waiting to happen, and never used it again. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 14:19   P and O - sherlock47

Could it have been Ostend Dover rather than Calais Dover? Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 15:23   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Not sure that in the options recounted so far anyone has mentioned the Dover Calais >> service that used a hydrofoil. Hoverspeed used a Incat wave piercing Catamarans in the nineties/noughties to supplement/replace the aging SRN 4 hovercraft. We travelled on one between Folkestone and either Calais or Boulogne in 2000. It was quick but bumpy and very noisy. Not an experience I ever wanted to repeat. Preferred Sea France for a while and then Norfolk Line to Dunkirk were cheap as chips in the mid/late noughties. IIRC there was a service from Brighton to Dieppe using a Boeing Jetfoil - passenger only. Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Sun 27 Mar 22 at 15:26 Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 15:56   P and O - smokie

I'm sure as staff I used a P&O hydrofoil but to Ostend or Zeebrugge, not Calais. I remember going up on the bridge on the return, and the capt trying to slice a floating log (I think we succeeded) and also we got buzzed by a low flying helicopter. As staff we used to have free foot passenger crossings and favourable duty free prices. So a few of us in the IT dept used to do a non-landing crossing (ferry) on a Thursday night when in other jobs you may have gone down the pub. Free crossing, 200 fags £2 and a litre of spirit £2, and drinks were at duty free prices (unlike now!!). My leaving do was on a a ferry and everyone gifted me 200 fags and a bottle and I left with thousands of the things. I finished the fags years ago but still have multiple bottles of Pernod, Bacardi and whisky. :-) Also had one completely free car crossing pa (with trailer if reqd) and one each half-year which was a really small cost. After leaving I bought a "carnet" of 10 hovercraft crossings a year for not a lot to use on the motor racing trips I used to do (mainly Le Mans and Spa) Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 16:47   P and O - tyrednemotional

>> I'm sure as staff I used a P&O hydrofoil but to Ostend or Zeebrugge >> ...the hydrofoil service was Dover-Ostend (and vv) run by RMT, the Belgian State ferry service (and some-time member of the Sealink alliance). After the Sealink days, I think they cooperated with P&O. I've done that crossing a few times, not least because it was free on my "All stations and ships" BR leather pass. At the time it was running, I also worked on the Sealink reservation system, which covered all the "consortium's" ferries. Last edited by: tyrednemotional on Sun 27 Mar 22 at 16:50 Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 16:00   P and O - Zero

>> >> Not sure that in the options recounted so far anyone has mentioned the Dover >> Calais >> >> service that used a hydrofoil. >> >> Hoverspeed used a Incat wave piercing Catamarans in the nineties/noughties to supplement/replace the aging SRN >> 4 hovercraft. We travelled on one between Folkestone and either Calais or Boulogne in 2000. Used the Incats to get the car to the Channel Islands, they were ok didn't find them that bumpy. Also used the big cat Stenna HSS discovery to Holland a few times, thats now been scrapped due to its prodigious thirst - that rode fine despite its reputation for ripping off the nose at 40 knots in large swells. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 16:51   P and O - bathtub tom

Whatever happened to Sally Lines? My kids used to love the 'ball pits'. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 17:14   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Whatever happened to Sally Lines? My kids used to love the 'ball pits'. Went bust in the late nineties. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 19:44   P and O - bathtub tom

What happened to the ships? Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 19:48   P and O - Falkirk Bairn

Google Sally line and the ship history up to 2008 is there Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 27 Mar 22 19:53   P and O - CGNorwich

The Sally Star is now the Wasa Express currently moored in Nador Morrocco after travelling from Almeria Spain Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 12:38   P and O - Zero

Been chaos at Dover due to P&O not operating (plus brexit sheet) for weeks now. P&O should be nationalised, now, with no compensation to the owners, in Leu of fines and legal action. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 13:07   P and O - smokie

Must admit I assumed P&O were probably simply coming into line with other similar companies. Did I read the other day that 799 of the 800 have accepted their offers and the only one who hasn't want the sous chef who made the front page of the Beeb news a couple of times, latterly because he is going to claim £79m from P&O? Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 13:46   P and O - CGNorwich

I guess everyone has their price. I suspect everyone who wanted a job has found one and are planning for a nice holiday or a new car and all the replacement foreign crew are happy to have found a job. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 15:29   P and O - Zero

>> replacement foreign crew are happy to have found a job. Except they don't , they don't have the relevant training and certificates to operate out of a British port. Hence no P&O ships sailing. And now no P&O revenue, large redundancy payments, its been a exercise out of the Putin self harm playbook. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 15:56   P and O - Duncan

>> Except they don't , they don't have the relevant training and certificates to operate out >> of a British port. Hence no P&O ships sailing. And now no P&O revenue, large >> redundancy payments, its been a exercise out of the Putin self harm playbook. People who understand this stuff, don't know why some people persist in using Dover. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 16:01   P and O - Zero

>> People who understand this stuff, don't know why some people persist in using Dover. Because it usually has the most capacity, its geographic location, and the lack of crossings elsewhere. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 12 Apr 22 15:39   P and O - sooty123

I'm not sure it always works out so neat and tidy. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 10:31   P and O - sooty123

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61086897 Looks like it's getting worse for P&O, another ship detained. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 10:44   P and O - smokie

This jogged my memory about one of the many rounds of redundancies I went through at the company where I worked the longest. On this occasion they laid off probably 25% of people in my tech area. There was a really clever and well regarded senior support guy who had been seconded elsewhere for a short while. I think the dept which was using him said he could be let go, so he was laid off, at about 11 am, and was walked out of the building with his belongings (as that was how it happened). By about 2 our dept head heard what had happened and said he should not have been let go. He called him, and apparently said he could keep a good chunk of his redundancy if he came back, but the guy had already called a contact and got a better paid job so we lost him. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 11:09   P and O - Terry

P&O gave as an explanation for the unseemly (possibly illegal) redundancies that it was necessary to secure the future of the company and all other jobs. By preventing the use of the P&O fleet the government are causing travel chaos and effectively doing that which the redundancies were intended to avoid - prevent company failure. Refusing to issue operating licences due to safety concerns is, of course, the responsible thing for any regulatory authority to do. But I can't help but wonder whether their actions are influenced by secondary motives - (a) prove that P&O are unfit to manage, (b) demonstrate that failure was inevitable, (c) dissuade other companies from similar redundancy action. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 14:48   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> But I can't help but wonder whether their actions are influenced by secondary motives - >> (a) prove that P&O are unfit to manage, (b) demonstrate that failure was inevitable, (c) >> dissuade other companies from similar redundancy action. The Maritime and Coastguard Agency is wholly independent of government. Having worked for a similar Arm's Length Body in the past doing bidding of Ministers is absolutely counter to their culture. What we're seeing with P&O is the equivalent of the CAA inspecting an airline and grounding it. Unlike aircrew who are allocated to any machine their ratings qualify them for crew belong to one ship so if they're not gelling it's the ship that's 'grounded'. I don't think the MCA will be doing any favours though. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 16:09   P and O - Zero

>> I don't think the MCA will be doing any favours though. Ring Ring "Hello MCA?" "sorry? you have sacked all the staff, including the officers, and have replaced them with non English speaking Vietnamese fisherman at £0.99p a day. Riiiiiiggghhht Ok. And you want to commence sailings tomorrow?" - long pause - "We'll be over tomorrow morning, dont go anywhere" Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 13:28   P and O - Zero

>> This jogged my memory about one of the many rounds of redundancies I went through >> at the company where I worked the longest. I contracted at Merrill Lynch when they had a major redundancy round. Leavers were targeted overnight, and the first thing they knew was when they tried to swipe in the next morning, access was blocked and they were escorted to a side entrance where they were handed a cardboard box with their personal belongings and told to leave the premises by a big fella. Two years later the sub prime chaos killed the company. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 16:59   P and O - Fullchat

I did hear a rumour locally from fairly close to the horses mouth that members of the group of P&O employees who were the subject to the redundancies were also quite adept at maxing out their sickness entitlements in true British public service/government employee fashion. As I say just a rumour. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 17:47   P and O - smokie

Yes ISTR that was the way it worked when I was there many years ago. Their working pattern wasn't so bad either - 1 week on, 1 week off, the week on was spent on the boat where I guess everything was paid for. Salaries not phenomenal and 12 hour shifts but I remember the few boat people I was friendly with were absolutely happy with it (many had a second job on the other week). Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 13 Apr 22 18:31   P and O - zippy

>>Merrill Lynch... I celebrated their demise. They caused me a lot of legal problems that I will never financially recover from. American Express in Brighton operated the same procedures when redundancies were made. I think the way they do it now is more "humane" after a lot of bad press in Brighton. I had an involvement (not employment but visiting with a view to working on a syndicated loan) with BNY and they were even worse. Experienced bank and credit professionals were working in a climate of fear. The US managing director walked around UK office with 2 bodyguards, picked up a ringing phone and told a major customer to F off and not call again - without even hearing who it was calling. We refused to work with them for reputational risk issues and shortly after they had to close the UK office they had just purchased from a major UK bank at a significant loss because they just didn't get the culture of doing business in the UK. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 24 Apr 22 19:59   P and O - zippy

Just when you thought that P&O could sink no further... They (try) to reduce the wages of the new staff from £5.50 per hour to £4.50 per hour. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10747957/P-O-Ferries-sparks-fresh-fury-trying-CUT-wages-new-low-paid-foreign-staff.html Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 25 Apr 22 09:27   P and O - Zero

And they fail AGAIN www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61209894 Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 26 Apr 22 15:15   P and O - Bobby

P&O ferry European Causeway adrift off coast of Larne www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-61229753 Reply to this message | Report message

New Sat 1 Oct 22 09:13   P and O - sooty123

news.sky.com/story/only-seafarer-to-turn-down-p-o-payoff-following-mass-sackings-wins-claim-for-unfair-dismissal-12708556 A very generous man, well done. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 2 Oct 22 21:59   P and O - Fullchat

I had 3 motorcycles and riders booked from Hull to Zeebrugge Easter 20 and then Covid hit. P&O weren't offering refunds but they did offer credits to be used by Sept 2022. However as time went on a similar trip to Europe never materialised. However in Spring I contacted them asking that as they had pulled the plug on the Zeebrugge route I would like a refund. There were a couple of "Were dealing with a high number of calls and if you hear nothing within 28 days' please contact us again". The money was refunded after about 6 weeks. Last edited by: Fullchat on Sun 2 Oct 22 at 22:00 Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 2 Oct 22 22:27   P and O - Manatee

Used them for Dover Calais last month. They were cancelling crossings for "technical reasons" i.e savings operating costs and combining crossings. We had been warned that food options were limited and of poor quality as was confirmed by a couple of our fellow travellers. Reply to this message | Report message

New Sun 2 Oct 22 23:35   P and O - R.P.

Used them last month from Harwich to Hoek. Very efficient in loading and the ship (The Hollandica) was spotless. Slept like a log on the night crossing home (Cabin both ways well worth the money £25.00 outbound and a £55.00 inbound) - staffed by south Asians all with perfect English and customer care. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 00:25   P and O - Ted

Used them several times for bike trips down to the Alps. Ideal for us, 110 leisurely miles on M62, boarding at 4pm. Dinner and breakfast tickets bought then into the bar. Food superb, all you can eat at both meals with a massive choice. Bar again then woken at 6ish for brekkie. Released into Zeebrugge about 8 then off we go. Very civilised crossing ! Four of us went by car to Givet on the Meuse and got upgraded on the return, large cabins, window and minibar, white bathrobes...the lot, all free ! Ted Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 07:03   P and O - legacylad

Back in the mid 70s I met a Dutch lass on holiday in Spain and for two years I used the Hull - Rotterdam sailing every 3 weeks during university term time. She was at uni in Leiden, 90 mins from Rotterdam on two buses. Friday night sailing, then back into Hull Monday AM and straight to work via the M62. From memory the ships were the Norwave and Norstar ? I suppose at some point P & O bought out North Sea Ferries....last time I used them was Hull > Zeebrugge to visit Belgian friends who lived in La Louviere, just east of Mons. Our car at the time was a third hand Saab 9000 CS 2.3 Turbo, a real gas guzzler, but you could open it up on the roads in that part of the world Last edited by: legacylad on Mon 3 Oct 22 at 07:05 Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 07:44   P and O - Manatee

I've been on the Hollandica too. It was excellent. But is is Stena Line not P&O. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 07:49   P and O - tyrednemotional

>> I've been on the Hollandica too. It was excellent. But is is Stena Line not >> P&O. >> ...indeed it is, and my experience of Stena (Harwich-Hoek and vv) has historically been rather better than the P&O Hull crossings. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 07:52   P and O - Crankcase

Last time I went on a cross channel ferry it was more like this. Nice nostalgic view of the nightmare of lorry driving in the sixties. youtu.be/fhuaf8s-peI Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 10:04   P and O - R.P.

Ah yes..my bad ! What I was thinking of as to how Stena "re-staffed" their ships a few years ago, but to less fanfare than P&O's recent disaster ! We sailed with Stena from Holyhead recently, their staff seemed to be local, lots of them Welsh speaking - that sailing was very efficient as well. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 13:13   P and O - Fullchat

Certainly from my part of the world the Hull ferries are very civilised even if a little expensive. All day to pack and get organised an set off late afternoon and its home in half an hour after returning. The meal and drinks on board on the way out were all part of the start of the holiday. Last edited by: Fullchat on Mon 3 Oct 22 at 13:15 Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 15:03   P and O - Kevin

>The meal and drinks on board.. The last time I used the Hull > Zeebrugge ferry, admittedly years ago, drivers were being breathalysed as they exited the ferry terminal. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 15:50   P and O - Zero

>> Certainly from my part of the world the Hull ferries are very civilised even if >> a little expensive. All day to pack and get organised an set off late afternoon >> and its home in half an hour after returning. The meal and drinks on board >> on the way out were all part of the start of the holiday. There are of course better options down south than P&O, Brittany ferries to France and Spain out of Portsmouth & Poole are pretty civilised, Portsmouth is a great option for me. Why anyone would consider a Ferry out of Dover is beyond me, when you can use Eurotunnel. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 16:07   P and O - Manatee

>> Why anyone would consider a Ferry out of Dover is beyond me, when you can >> use Eurotunnel. Good question. We booked a ferry and hotel package. They did say we could have the tunnel if we wanted but it would cost more. I didn't bother to check how much. I like boats anyway. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 16:16   P and O - tyrednemotional

>> >> Why anyone would consider a Ferry out of Dover is beyond me, when you can >> use Eurotunnel. >> ...cost... (plus, if you've travelled some way to Dover, there's a certain attraction in getting a 90+ minute break with the ability to get some fresh air and exercise) Last edited by: tyrednemotional on Mon 3 Oct 22 at 16:21 Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 4 Oct 22 12:56   P and O - R.P.

I've used the ferries and tunnel over the years. Tunnel's great but when you don't feel the need to hurry and for a small extra wedge you can use the "vip" lounge (free snacks and coffee and NO kids) it's actually quite nice. Reply to this message | Report message

New Tue 4 Oct 22 13:00   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> I've used the ferries and tunnel over the years. Tunnel's great but when you don't >> feel the need to hurry and for a small extra wedge you can use the >> "vip" lounge (free snacks and coffee and NO kids) it's actually quite nice. Our last trip was on Irish Ferries. They seem to allow, or certainly did not stop, kids entering the 'vip' lounge. Furthermore they failed to stop the family with kids playing devices at a volume audible across the width of the lounge. Experience with P&O's lounge, albeit before the shakeout, was more positive. Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Tue 4 Oct 22 at 13:01 Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 5 Oct 22 08:11   P and O - sherlock47

>> I've used the ferries and tunnel over the years. Tunnel's great but when you don't >> feel the need to hurry and for a small extra wedge you can use the >> "vip" lounge (free snacks and coffee and NO kids) it's actually quite nice. >> The Lounge at Calais provides almost endless good quality food and drink, with a carrier bag to fill for each passenger. Whist an expensive solution, if you have a car full of passengers...... The Folkestone lounge is not open until 06.00 IIRC so not as beneficial if travelling off peak with shorter queues. Not sure about no kids tho. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 5 Oct 22 10:01   P and O - R.P.

I crossed over twice with Stena to Ireland. Horrendous behaviour from some children - some were brazenly thieving from the shop. With no parental input as and when they were approached by staff. Didn't see the VIP lounge on that trip so I can't comment, but always found them undisturbed on channel crossings. Well worth the extra £10.00 or so. Reply to this message | Report message

New Wed 5 Oct 22 11:01   P and O - sherlock47

My comments above were for Tunnel Xings. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 16:24   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Why anyone would consider a Ferry out of Dover is beyond me, when you can >> use Eurotunnel. I've always found the Shuttle to be considerably more costly than the ferry. More so with a caravan. As a half hour crossing there's no need for onboard facilities and all you can do is sit in the car. From here to Dover is the best part of three hours. By that time we need a break and the time on the ferry with an opportunity to eat walk around on deck etc is welcome. When the kids were young we had a well settled arrangement where we left home late morning, got an afternoon crossing to Calais then stayed there overnight before early brekkie and hitting the road at 07:00. The shuttle would not have added anything meaningful. Bit more time to spare back inbound from le continent but the time saving over the ferry, allowing that the ferry is preparation for the last three hours to home with food/drink etc it's not worth £££ extra for the shuttle that way either. It was though good for a day trip from CAMC Black Horse Farm (or even on the odd occasion from home) or a long weekend on a Shuttle excursion ticket. EDIT: TLDR - what TnE said. Last edited by: Bromptonaut on Mon 3 Oct 22 at 16:26 Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 16:56   P and O - sooty123

What's the price difference on a typical crossing? Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 17:03   P and O - tyrednemotional

...on my recent checks, the Tunnel has been about double for the motorhome (difference of maybe £150 for a return). I've just done a quick comparison for a car, and that looks to be in the same ballpark. That said, my just-finished 3-week jaunt to the Continent was by Eurotunnel at a cost of £5 plus £120 of Tesco vouchers (at 3 to 1 value) which makes it more palatable. I'm a long-term user of the ferries as, as a BR employer in the dim past) I used to get large discounts on the then Sealink. (I also worked on their reservation system). Over time, the gap in price narrowed, and we've generally used the Tunnel as of late, but the gap has definitely widened again, and the boat would have been favoured this time if it weren't for Mr Tesco. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 17:13   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> What's the price difference on a typical crossing? Going out next Saturday with Berlingo and a small caravan is around £100 single (ie £200 return) more on Le Shuttle than DFDS. Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 19:59   P and O - sooty123

Not nothing then, it's 45 mins vs 90 mins on the ferry? Reply to this message | Report message

New Mon 3 Oct 22 22:13   P and O - Bromptonaut

>> Not nothing then, it's 45 mins vs 90 mins on the ferry? The Shuttle is 35 minutes from Folkestone to Coquelles. The ferry is 75mins to 2 hours depending on vessel and whether you cross to Calais or Dunkerque. Whether ferry or Shuttle there's time spent checking in and in the assembly area and loading. If you're starting your journey from well north of the M25 then if an extra 40 minutes on the boat removes a need to stop at Farthing Corner services to stretch legs and wring out kids you're 'even Stevens'. Reply to this message | Report message