There's another possible nuance here in that a "quotation" could be an offer, or depending on how it is worded, an "invitation to treat".
As a non-lawyer, I guess it could be argued strongly that it is an offer if it includes adequate specifications of the goods and services to be provided, payment terms and or time limits for acceptance etc., i.e. it must be an offer that is capable of being accepted and reasonably complete in its terms.
Conversely, a buyer who gets a quotation and then sends his own purchase order containing the usual onerous terms that buyers usually slip in would probably argue the the PO is the offer, which the supplier accepts.
If it's a car, the bit of paper that would usually be waved about would be the order form, which would be signed by both parties and would include an offer and acceptance if it had been competently drawn up.
In the example you give, maybe it doesn't matter whether the quote is an offer - if it is, and the customers says "get on with it then" then that would be a contract (although difficult for the supplier to prove). If the quote is simply an invitation to treat, then the verbal acceptance of the quote could be the offer (order) and the commencement of the work the evidence of its acceptance.
The customer is in the pound seats here, because he can probably prove both the quote and the work, but the supplier can't prove the verbal agreement. The only one who can really 'prove' the contract to any degree is the customer, but even then there could be an argument about what exactly he said.
Last edited by: Manatee on Fri 7 Apr 17 at 17:34
|