If (and a big IF), the footage that has been used is genuine unretouched the presenter makes a fairly compelling case.
I have always been a doubter (of the coverage, not whether they have actually been there), and this seems to add some new material.
Be prepared to sit thro 50 minutes if you are minded to watch it.
www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/209455/moon_hoax_now_2015_documentary/
|
Pathetic lot. I've forgotten the link frequencies, but they were in the range that general coverage receivers for VHF could manage. As a result, the communications between space and the Cape were receivable by anyone with such a receiver.
Obviously you only heard one side, but faking that would be very, very difficult as VHF is essentially line of sight so the reception is very dependant on where in space the signal is coming from.
|
|
Definitely "a work of Art"! - probably one of the best Sci-fi movies ever created. If they had landed on the moon, you can bet your A*** they'd have a station there by now, instead of one in near Earth orbit.
|
It would have been more expensive to fake it than to do it - Neil Armstrong.
You think the Russians and Chinese weren't watching? And they wouldn't have had a hullabaloo if they'd detected something iffy?
|
>>something iffy?<<
So that's where he went then.
Pat
|
Something to think about... - Slidingpillar
