The day of the accident was the first day of flight duty after a 16-day vacation period.
Body was in the plane, mind still on the beach? :)
|
>> The day of the accident was the first day of flight duty after a 16-day
>> vacation period.
>>
>> Body was in the plane, mind still on the beach? :)
>>
Maybe. More likely a consequence of the 5.30am start - probably assume an hour and a half to get to work, then 45 minutes before that to get ready leads to a wake-up at 3.15am.
And on a related note, which prat designed the aircraft such that the "weight-on-wheels" switch is on the nose gear?
|
>> to a wake-up at 3.15am.
...probably after 16 days of (relative) lie-ins? Completely understandable.
|
>>And on a related note, which prat designed the aircraft such that the "weight-on-wheels" switch is on the nose gear?<<
That was my feeling too. Good design should cater for prats who make mistakes. Presumably they were lucky that it was a longish runway, lightly loaded? Does that paricular type of ircraft have a history of this?
|
>> And on a related note, which prat designed the aircraft such that the "weight-on-wheels" switch
>> is on the nose gear?
Yer, thats not a very common configuration for obvious reasons!
|