I recall that our American friends wanted to load very expensive Trident Missiles with a ton or two of titanium rather then a nuclear warhead, for use when nukes were not needed. The kinetic impact of such a weapon would still cause a fair amount of damage (if it were accurate enough).
However, the Russians pooped on the idea claiming that if they detected a launch, how would they know if the missile was carrying expensive metal or nukes. The resulting retaliation would be the same.
New Sun 17 Jan 16 13:00
Trident submarines but without warheads ? - Old Navy
Very few people know how many missiles are loaded, how many tubes contain concrete weights, (to make the submarine heavy enough to dive), or how many, if any, warheads are fitted to any missile. I would be surprised if Corbyn was one of them.
Last edited by: Old Navy on Sun 17 Jan 16 at 13:02
New Sun 17 Jan 16 13:18
Trident submarines but without warheads ? - Roger.
>> With such clear thinking , a future prime minister ?
It's a bribe to the unions involved in the Trident (plus all the ancillary services) as jobs would go if Trident was scrapped.